Lockout devices used for other purposes
Apply this to your situation
This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.
NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.
March 3, 1992
MEMORANDUM FOR: JOHN T. PHILLIPS
REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: PATRICIA K. CLARK, DIRECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS
SUBJECT: Request for Concurrence with an Interpretation of 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii) - Lockout Devices
This is in response to your memorandum of April 19, 1991 asking if the use of a lock, which had been assigned to an authorized employee for use as a lockout device, and was also being used to lock tool boxes, was a violation of the standard. Please accept our apologies for the extreme delay in responding.
The answer is yes. It is a violation of the standard to use a lockout device for other purposes. If the lock is intended for use as a lockout device under the standard, but is also being used to lock tool boxes, then this is a violation of 1910.147(c)(5)(ii). This confirms a conversation on June 11, 1991 between Jeff Finch, formally of our staff, and Jonas Miniatas of your Office of Technical Support.
We hope this helps to clarify your concerns.
What does federal law require in your situation?
Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace