Back to Federal guidance

Scaffold plank tables and proposed performance rules

Summary An engineer urged OSHA to update scaffold plank strength values and check actual plank sizes in inspections. OSHA said it had forwarded the suggestions to rulemaking and field staff and described a pending proposal to use performance criteria instead of mandatory load tables. OSHA archives the letter and warns that it may no longer reflect current policy.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1992-02-13-3
Date issued
February 13, 1992
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

February 13, 1992
Mr. Ralph E. Bennett III, PE
[Recipient address omitted]

Dear Mr. Bennett:
This is in response to your letter of November 19, 1991, and your Fax message of January 20, 1992, in which you set forth research conclusions and other information related to Table L-3 of 29 CFR 1926.451(a)(10), a table setting forth planking requirements for scaffolds used in construction. I apologize for the delay in responding to you letter.

Your comments that minimum fiber stress and modulus of elasticity values be specified in future directives are appreciated and such action will be taken as priorities allow. In addition your comments have been forwarded to the Office of Construction and Civil Engineering Safety Standards for evaluation and possible incorporation into the final rule for scaffolds that is now being developed.

Your suggestion that compliance officers check actual plank dimensions to determine if properly sized lumber is being used has been forwarded to the Office of Field Programs for appropriate consideration.

With respect to developing future load tables, please be advised that the current Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements will very likely be modified to parallel the provisions set forth in OSHA's 1986 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for scaffolds. As you know, that document uses performance language in lieu of specification criteria and would place all the existing tables into a non-mandatory appendix. That approach allows updated information, such as you have provided, to be recognized more easily by OSHA without additional formal rulemaking. The approach clarifies that OSHA is not a design agency, however, it allows OSHA to recognize designs and criteria (such as updated ANSI A10.8 tables) that are demonstrated to be appropriate for use and which comply with OSHA's performance criteria.

If you need further assistance, please contact Mr. Roy F. Gurnham or Mr. Dale Cavanaugh of my staff in the Office of Construction and Maritime Compliance Assistance at (202) 523-8136.

Sincerely,
Patricia K. Clark, Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace