Back to Federal guidance

Who may remove a lockout device

Summary OSHA noted that a trade magazine described a foreman removing a worker’s lock during lockout. OSHA said the employee who applied the lock normally must remove it; management can do so only when that employee is unavailable and the rule’s exception steps are met. OSHA labels the memo archival.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1991-09-04
Date issued
September 4, 1991
Status
Archived by the agency
This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy; OSHA presents it as historical content for research and review.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy; OSHA presents it as historical content for research and review. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

September 4, 1991

MEMORANDUM FOR: JAMES F. FOSTER, DIRECTOR

OFFICE OF INFORMATION AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS

THROUGH: PATRICIA K. CLARK, DIRECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS

FROM: RAYMOND E. DONNELLY, DIRECTOR
GENERAL INDUSTRY COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE

Subject: Article In Magazine Containing Incorrect Information
About Lockout/Tagout Requirements

The purpose of this memorandum is to bring to your attention the attached memorandum, dated July 10, from Linda Anku, Regional Administrator for Region III. The memorandum discusses an incorrect statement about a lockout/tagout procedure that was published is a magazine called Safety and Health. The magazine is associated with the National Safety Council.

The article (copy enclosed), which relates to welding safety, appeared in the April 1991 issue. The statement was made that there are two people involved in the lockout procedure. The article mentions the employee who puts the lock on and the foreman who takes it off.

This statement does not meet the intent of 29 CFR 1910.147(e)(3) which requires the person who applied the lock to be the one to remove it. the only exception to this is when the employee who applied the lock is not available to remove it. This would be in a case of illness, temporary absence from the job, etc. When this does occur, then only management may remove the lock, but only after certain requirements are met, as outlined 29 CFR 1910.147(e)(3)(i),(ii), and (iii). (copy enclosed)

We contacted the magazine to point out the mistake in the article, and to advise them that a request for correction would be made.

The corrections request can be made to:

Editor - Safety & Health Magazine
National Safety Council
444 N. Michigan Ave.
Chicago, Illinois 60611
Telefax # (312) 527-9381

If you need further information from us, you may call Jeff Finch of my staff at 523-8031.

Your attention to this matter is appreciated.

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace