Back to Federal guidance

Masonry wall support and a variance request

Summary A masonry contractor sought a permanent variance from construction rules for limited access zones and wall bracing. OSHA said each job requires an evaluation of whether walls are adequately supported against overturning or collapse; an engineering evaluation may help. OSHA concluded that a variance from the performance standard was unnecessary and took no further action.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1991-07-10
Date issued
July 10, 1991
Status
Active
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

July 10, 1991

Mr. Luis Puig, Jr.
Vice President
A.L.L. Masonry Construction Company, Inc.
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Puig,

This is in reference to our letter dated June 12, 1991 concerning your request for a permanent variance from Sections 1926.706(a)(2), (3), (4) and (5) and (b) regarding Concrete and Masonry Construction, of the Safety and Health Regulations for Construction.

Section 1910.706 is a performance standard which provides guidance on how to meet the requirements and intent of the regulation. As an example, Sections 1926.706(a)(1) through (4) provides guidance on how to establish a limited access if the wall is not adequately supported. However, as Section 1926.706(a)(5) states the limited access is required only until the wall is adequately supported to prevent overturning or collapse.

Section 1926.706(b) provides similar guidance when it states that masonry walls over eight feet shall be adequately braced to prevent overturning and to prevent collapse unless the wall is adequately supported so that it will not overturn or collapse.

Each case or job must be evaluated by the employer to determine that the wall(s) is adequately supported to meet the requirements of Section 1926.706. An engineering evaluation of your method of securing a wall might be appropriate and available on the job.

A variance from a performance standard is not appropriate or necessary. No further action will be taken on your request for a variance.

If I can be of any assistance, please contact my office at (202) 523-7193.

Sincerely,
James J. Concannon
Director
Office of Variance Determination

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace