De minimis treatment of spray booth metal deflector provision
Apply this to your situation
This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.
July 9, 1991
Mr. Richard F. Andree
Executive Vice President
Safety and Health Management Consultants, Inc.
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Andree:
Thank you for your letter of June 6, requesting confirmation that 1910.107(b)(6) is, in fact, an Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirement and, if so, an explanation of the hazard it is designed to control.
The 1910.107(b)(6) standard was part of the NFPA-33-1969 standard adopted into the OSHA standards in the early years of the agency's existence under Section 6(a) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act. Subsequently, this provision was deleted from NFPA-33 when revised in 1985.
Based on our review of the revised NFPA standard and because there is no apparent hazard, 1910.107(b)(6) is subject to OSHA's policy of de minimis violations. This means the employer will not be penalized simply because the spray booth does not have a metal deflector or curtain which complies with 1910.107(b)(6). A technical violation of the standard would exist but no citation would be issued, and the employer would not have to take corrective action.
We appreciate your interest in employee safety and health. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Gerard F. Scannell
Assistant Secretary
What does federal law require in your situation?
Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace