Back to Federal guidance

Training hours for post-emergency beach cleanup crews

Summary An OSHA memorandum addressed reports that beach cleanup crews always needed 24 hours of HAZWOPER training. OSHA said that amount might be appropriate for some operations, while fewer hours could be acceptable if the criteria in its post-emergency response directive were met. It asked regional officials to resolve the reported confusion with the Coast Guard's Pacific Strike Force.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1991-07-01-0
Date issued
July 1, 1991
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document that may no longer represent policy.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document that may no longer represent policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

July 1, 1991

MEMORANDUM FOR: FRANK STRASHIEM
REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR

THROUGH: LEO CAREY, DIRECTOR
OFFICE OF FIELD PROGRAMS

FROM: PATRICIA K. CLARK, DIRECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS

SUBJECT: Pacific Strike Force 24 Hour Training Requirement.

In the attached memorandum from Region VIII, it is reported that the USCG's Pacific Strike Force indicated 24 hours of training was required by OSHA for beach cleanup crews. While in certain operations this may be appropriate, fewer than 24 hours of training may be acceptable for other activity if the criteria in OSHA instruction CPL 2-2.51 is met.

We would like to request that Region IX coordinate with the Pacific Strike Force in order to minimize any ambiguity in regards to training requirements for post emergency response beach cleanup crews. Please notify Region VIII of the outcome.

We would also like to request that any correspondence on this matter be sent to the Office of Health Compliance Assistance for our files.

We hope this information is helpful. If you have any further questions please feel free to contact us at (202) 523-8036.

Attachment
March 22, 1991

MEMORANDUM FOR: PATRICIA K. CLARK Directorate of Compliance Programs

THROUGH: LEO CAREY, DIRECTOR
Office of Field Programs

FROM: BYRON R. CHADWICK
Regional Administrator, VIII

SUBJECT: Regional Response Team Meeting

In response to your memo requesting feedback on OSHA's CPL 2-2.51, Inspection Guidelines for Post-Emergency Response Operations, under 29 CFR 1910.120, at a RRT meeting, we are providing the following information. During region VIII's recent RRT meeting, held in Denver, Colorado, 3/19 - 3/21/91, OSHA was given the opportunity to discuss our 1910.120 standard. The RRT participants response to this directive was overwhelmingly supportive.

However, a few questions/concerns were raised. Several concerns revolved around apparent inconsistencies in the application of this directive, particularly with State-plan OSHA states. At the recent oil spill scenario in California the Pacific Strike Force (USCG) indicated 24-hour training was required by OSHA for beach clean-up crews.

The USCG is confused and unhappy with Alaska's apparent initiation of an 80-hour training requirement for employees covered by OSHA's 1910.120 standard.

Some participants wanted further clarification between an initial emergency response and a post-emergency response with regard to an oil spill that flows further and further down a shore line. Is each new breach of a beach considered a "new" initial emergency response? Or is everything subsequent to the spill considered post-emergency response?
U.S.Department of Labor
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
1861 Stout Street
Denver, Colorado 80294

Reply to the Attention of:

November 20, 1990

MEMORANDUM FOR: ALL REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS

THROUGH: LEO CAREY, DIRECTOR
OFFICE FIELD PROGRAMS

FROM: PATRICIA K. CLARK, DIRECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS

SUBJECT: Regional Response Team Meeting

This is in response to a request made at the last meeting of the National response Team And Regional Response Team (RRT) co-chairs. OSHA RRT representatives have been asked to review OSHA Instruction CPL 2-2.51, Inspection Guidelines for Post-Emergency Response Operations Under 29 CFR 1910.120, at a RRT meeting.

Please attempt to get OSHA on the agenda for the next meeting.

We would be interested in your written comments on how the directive was received by the RRT.

Thanks for your cooperation.

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace