Back to Federal guidance

Rebar impalement protection and scaffold midrails

Summary A safety adviser asked about exposed reinforcing steel and a proposed scaffold guardrail design. OSHA said its concrete and masonry rule protects against falls into both vertical and horizontal protruding rods. It said the proposed top rail and toeboard partly addressed scaffold guarding but lacked a required midrail.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1991-06-18-1
Date issued
June 18, 1991
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document that may no longer represent policy.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document that may no longer represent policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

June 18, 1991
Mr. Paul Vincent Bonfigio
Safety Advisor
Vincent Safety Service Company
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Bonfigio:
Thank you for your letters of March 28, 1991 concerning guarding of protruding reinforcement steel rods and May 29, 1991 concerning guardrails on intermediate levels of scaffolds.
When the standard on concrete and masonry construction was changed in 1988, it was broadened to protect employees not only while working above vertically protruding rod but also to protects employees from the hazard of falling into horizontal protruding rods or rods at the same level as the employee.
Enclosed are the pages from the Federal Register of the preamble which address this change.
Your suggestion to use a 2" x 4" wood rail or pipe rail placed horizontally at or near the junction of the cross braces and a plank for a toeboard would partially address the guard rail problem on the intermediate levels; however it does not provide for a midrail as required. Enclosed find a copy of material on a unit made by WACO SCAFFOLDING and EQUIPMENT which appeared in the April 1991 issue of the Newletter of the SCAFFOLD INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION.
If I may be of further assistance please contact me.
Sincerely,
Patricia K. Clark, Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace