Back to Federal guidance

Type C soil assumption instead of trench soil testing

Summary A lawyer asked whether an employer must test trench soil if it assumes the weakest Type C category and protects workers accordingly. OSHA said testing would be unnecessary if the employer meets all applicable protective-system requirements for Type C soil. OSHA emphasized that the employer bears the burden of proving its protections meet those requirements.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1991-06-05-0
Date issued
June 5, 1991
Status
Active
OSHA says it reviewed this letter May 31, 2018, made non-substantive changes, and confirmed that the posted version reflects current OSHA regulations and policies.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

June 5, 1991 [Reviewed May 31, 2018]

Mr. Michael S. Holman
Bricker & Eckler
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Holman:

This is in response to your letter of April 16, requesting an interpretation of 29 C.F.R. Part 1926.650, et seq.

Specifically, you advised that a client of your firm has asked whether it must test soil under the requirements of the above cited part of 1926, if it assumes the soil is Type C soil and provides the required employee protection for Type C soil, regardless of the type of soil present. Your client therefore feels that no purpose would be served by soil testing in that circumstance and soil testing should not be required, assuming the employer provides the employee protection required for Type C soil.

Since Type C soil is the lowest strength (weakest) soil, if the employer meets the requirements of 29 C.F.R. 1926.652 (Requirements for Protective Systems) and Appendices A, B, C and D to Subpart P, as applicable to Type C soil, soil testing would be superfluous and not required. I must stress the employer bears the burden of proof that this is, indeed, the case.

Thank you for your interest in occupational safety and health. We hope you find this information helpful. OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards, and regulations. Our letters of interpretation do not create new or additional requirements but rather explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. From time to time, letters are affected when the Agency updates a standard, a legal decision impact a standard, or changes in technology affect the interpretation. To assure that you are using the correct information and guidance, please consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov. If you have further questions, please feel free to contact the Directorate of Construction at (202) 693-2020.*

Sincerely,
Gerald P. Reidy, Director
Office of Construction and
Maritime Compliance Assistance

*[This letter has been modified (non-substantive changes) on May 31, 2018, and reflects current OSHA regulations and policies.]

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace