Back to Federal guidance

Correction of TCE flammability statement in earlier HAZWOPER letter

Summary OSHA corrected its earlier statement that trichloroethylene had no fire hazard. It said TCE can burn and gave its explosive limits and flash point, but the earlier answer still held for the example because the permissible exposure level was far below the lower explosive limit. The correction changes the reason for the answer, not OSHA's conclusion for those facts.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1991-06-05
Date issued
June 5, 1991
Status
Active
This June 5, 1991 OSHA letter corrects a factual statement in OSHA's September 4, 1990 response concerning trichloroethylene (TCE).
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

June 5, 1991

Dr. Richard F. Boggs
Vice President
Organization Resources Counselors, Inc.
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Dr. Boggs:

It has come to our attention that there exists a factual inaccuracy in our letter to you dated September 4, 1990. On page three in the last paragraph we incorrectly stated that "there is no fire hazard [associated with TCE]". Although TCE burns with difficulty, it has a lower explosive level of 8% and an upper explosive level of 10.5%, a flash point of 90 degrees F and is considered and IC flammable liquid (NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards).

Because the PEL is well below the lower explosive level, there would be little potential of a fire hazard. Therefore the answer to the question remains correct although for different reasons i.e., not because TCE is not flammable, but rather because it is not a fire hazard at the concentrations described in the example.

We hope this inaccuracy has not caused your organization undo confusion in interpreting 1910.120.

I hope this information is helpful. If you have any further questions please feel free to contact MaryAnn Garrahan at (202) 523-8036.

Sincerely,
Patricia K. Clark, Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs

[The September 4, 1990 OSHA letter and related correspondence reproduced on the OSHA page are omitted here.]

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace