Back to Federal guidance

Formaldehyde medical screening and paid time

Summary A garment workers' union asked whether low formaldehyde air readings excused medical screening and whether workers could lose pay for it. OSHA said the 0.1 ppm language was guidance, not an exemption, and employers had to consider exceptional signs or symptoms. It said all required medical surveillance, including nonroutine screening, had to be provided without loss of pay.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1990-08-08
Date issued
August 8, 1990
Status
Active
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

August 8, 1990

Ms. Michelle Fecteau, Health and Safety Coordinator
International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Ms. Fecteau:

This is in response to your letter of June 11, concerning the medical surveillance requirements of the formaldehyde standard (29 CFR 1910.1048).

Your first question is whether employers are exempt from providing medical surveillance when air monitoring results indicate levels below .1 ppm. One condition that triggers the availability of nonroutine screening to test for possible formaldehyde-related illness is when the employer suspects that employees have signs or symptoms that may be related to their exposure to formaldehyde. Section (l)(1)(ii) of the standard states in part:

"When determining whether an employee may be experiencing signs and symptoms of possible overexposure to formaldehyde, the employer may rely on the evidence that signs and symptoms associated with formaldehyde exposure will occur only in exceptional circumstances when airborne exposure is less than 0.1 ppm and when formaldehyde is present in materials in concentrations less than 0.1 percent."

This section is a guideline and not an exemption. The employer must consider all exceptional circumstances, such as, more than one worker reports problems, the onset of signs and symptoms coincide with a new process, cloth, etc.

Your other question concerns rights of workers to get medical attention without loss of pay. Section (l)(2) of the formaldehyde standard clearly states that medical surveillance shall be provided without loss of pay. This section applies to all medical procedures including nonroutine screening to test for possible formaldehyde-related illness when the employer suspects that employees have signs or symptoms that may be related to their exposure to formaldehyde.

I hope this information is helpful. If we can be of further assistance, please contact us again.

Sincerely,

Patricia K. Clark Director Designate Directorate of Compliance Programs

[Requester letter reproduced on OSHA page; omitted here.]

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace