Back to Federal guidance

Field sanitation standard and reforestation hand labor

Summary A regional office asked why OSHA applied its agricultural field sanitation rule to reforestation. OSHA said reforestation involving hand labor fit the standard's coverage, citing its similarity to agricultural work and court treatment of reforestation workers under protective legislation. The memorandum addressed work meeting the rule's hand-labor definition.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1990-07-30-0
Date issued
July 30, 1990
Status
Active
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

July 30, 1990

MEMORANDUM FOR: LINDA R. ANKU

REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR

THROUGH: LEO CAREY, DIRECTOR OFFICE OF FIELD PROGRAMS

FROM: PATRICIA K. CLARK DIRECTOR DESIGNATE DIRECTORATE OF COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS

SUBJECT: Applicability of Field Sanitation Standard to Reforestation Activities

This is in response to your letter of January 25, addressed to Tom Shepich, former Director, Directorate of Compliance Programs, in which you requested, on behalf of the Commonwealth of Virginia, the basis upon which this Directorate determined that the Field Sanitation Standard (29 CFR 1928.110) is applicable to reforestation activities. Please excuse the delay in our response.

As you may be aware, we review the reforestation issue and concluded, in our November 6, 1989 memorandum to you (copy enclosed), that where reforestation activities involve "hand-labor operations" as defined in the standard, the provisions of the field sanitation standard are applicable. We based that decision on several facts. First, reforestation is similar to other agricultural field operations. Second, several courts have held that employees engaged in reforestation are covered by remedial legislation for the protection of agricultural workers. For example, the Ninth Circuit held in Bresgal v. Brock, 833 F.2d 763 (1987) that such workers are agricultural employees for the purposes of the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Workers Protection Act. In dictum, the Eleventh Circuit came to the same conclusion in Davis Forestry Corp. v. Smith, 707 F. 2d 1325, 1328 n. 3 (1983). Third, hand-labor operations, the most common method of performing reforestation activities, are explicitly covered in the scope of the Field Sanitation Standard.

The Agency's current position was developed through extensive intra-agency discussions. Our interpretation that the reforestation activity involving hand-labor operations in the field is covered under the relevant provisions of the Field Sanitation Standard was intended to provide, in the absence of a clear and unambiguous exemption of this activity from the provisions of the standard, the broadcast possible coverage for these workers.

If we can be further assistance, please feel free to contact James C. Dillard, of my staff, at (FTS) 523-8041.

Enclosure

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace