Back to Federal guidance

Farmworker pesticide communication and field sanitation inspections

Summary A farmworker legal group asked about field sanitation inspections and pesticide hazard information. OSHA said it planned to maintain inspections and had temporarily stopped enforcing the hazard communication rule for field pesticide exposure while resolving jurisdiction with EPA. Farmworkers outside fields or exposed to other hazardous chemicals remained covered. OSHA now archives the letter as potentially outdated.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1990-05-16-2
Date issued
May 16, 1990
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA archives this letter and says it may no longer represent OSHA policy.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA archives this letter and says it may no longer represent OSHA policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

May 16, 1990

Ms. Shelley Davis, Attorney at Law, Migrant Legal Action Program, Inc.
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Ms. Davis:

Thank you for your letter of March 21, in which you expressed your concerns about the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) enforcement of the Field Sanitation Standard, and of the Hazard Communication Standard with respect to pesticides. You also offered the assistance of the migrant legal services network to assist the Agency in its location of fields for field sanitation inspection scheduling.

OSHA's upcoming program directive on Field Sanitation will address many of the issues you raise in your letter. Specifically, we will continue to conduct coordinated inspections with personnel from the Employment Standards Administration (ESA) Wage Hour Division and will pursue intra-Agency discussions as to utilizing the assistance of the migrant legal services network in locating fields for inspections.

We plan to maintain our current level of field sanitation inspections. In Fiscal Year 1989, 3,043 agricultural inspections were conducted in both Federal enforcement States and in States with OSHA-approved plans, of which 1,526 were exclusively field sanitation inspections. Over 900 inspections from the latter figure were conducted in Federal enforcement states, with the remainder being conducted in State-Plan states. The vast majority of those inspections were planned, that is, they were not conducted as a result of employee complaints or referrals from other agencies.

You requested clarification of OSHA's enforcement of the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) with respect to pesticides. We have temporarily ceased enforcement of the HCS for the limited coverage provided to farmworkers exposed to pesticides while working in the field until the issue of enforcement jurisdiction is resolved between OSHA and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide & Rodenticide Act (FIFPA), EPA was given authority to promulgate and to enforce worker protection standards. OSHA has had similar authority under its HCS. Farm workers not in the fields who may be exposed to pesticides and those farm workers exposed to hazardous chemicals other than pesticides continue to be covered by the provisions of the HCS.

We expect to resolve the jurisdictional issue between OSHA and EPA in the near future. The final resolution of this jurisdictional issue may result in either agency assuming full or partial enforcement responsibility of the HCS.

If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely,

Gerard F. Scannell Assistant Secretary

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace