Back to Federal guidance

Field sanitation training for farmworkers

Summary A senator asked about field sanitation citations at a farm and the rule's hygiene instruction requirement. OSHA said employers must tell field workers why drinking water, handwashing and toilet use matter for preventing heat illness and disease. The required instruction need not be elaborate; posters, pamphlets or a brief discussion may work if effective for those employees.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1990-01-24
Date issued
January 24, 1990
Status
Active
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

January 24, 1990
The Honorable Steve Symms
United States Senator
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Senator Symms:
This is in further response to your letter of August 25, 1989, addressed to the Director of Intra-Governmental Affairs, Ms. Ruth Knight, in which you requested a full report regarding the issuance of citations by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to A. Gustaf Bryngelson of Rupert, Idaho. Please excuse our delay in responding to this request.
The inspection of Mr. Bryngelson's farm was conducted on May 31, 1989, under OSHA's National Emphasis Program to ensure employer compliance with 29 CFR 1928.110, Field Sanitation. This rule requires sanitation provisions necessary to ensure safe and healthy working conditions for farm workers.
The scope of the inspection was limited to the issue of field sanitation. During the inspection, several violations of this standard were observed, including inadequate toilet facilities, failure to provide separate drinking water cups, failure to inform the workers of hazards to which they are exposed in the field, and the use of the hygiene facilities to prevent these problems. The citation was issued on June 30, 1989, with no proposed penalty, and the case was subsequently closed when a letter documenting abatement was received from the employer.
Mr. Bryngelson's primary concern is the requirements of the standard 29 CFR 1928.110(c)(4), which states in part:

The employer ... shall inform each employee of the importance of each of the following good hygiene practices to minimize exposure to the hazards in the field of heat, communicable diseases, retention of urine and agrichemical residues:
(i) Use the water and facilities provided for drinking, handwashing and elimination;
(ii) Drink water frequently and especially on hot days;
(iii) Urinate as frequently as necessary;
(iv) Wash hands both before and after using the toilet; and
(v) Wash hands before eating and smoking.

This requirement and the rest of the standard were developed to reduce the incidence rate of disease in farmworker populations related to their work. Studies have found that farmworkers face greatly increased risks of suffering the following types of conditions which can be prevented by good sanitation practices:

(1) Heat stroke or other related illnesses from failing to consume adequate quantities of water;
(2) Parasitic infections and other communicable diseases from poor hygiene practices;
(3) Various diseases caused by agrichemicals used in crops when workers are unable to wash chemicals off; and
(4) Urinary tract infections caused by urine retention.

During the hearings held prior to the promulgation of the standard, numerous health professionals and farm labor representatives testified that training is an essential part of a sanitation program because many workers do not understand risks they face as farmworkers. As a result, this provision was added to the standard.
The training envisioned under the standard is not elaborate but may be accomplished through the use of posters, pamphlets, or perhaps a brief discussion with workers. The employer is allowed great flexibility to use the approach that will be most effective for his employees.
Additionally, in regard to Mr. Bryngelson's request for information on the correct screen mesh size for his toilet facilities, the Boise Area Office did not initially respond because work was no longer being conducted at the site. However, the Area Office will contact the employer at his business address and provide the requested information.
I hope this reply has been fully responsive to Mr. Bryngelson's concerns. if you have any further questions, please feel free to contact our Boise Area Office:

[Boise Area Office
1150 North Curtis Road, Suite 201
Boise, Idaho 83706
(208) 321-2960
(208) 321-2966 Fax]

Sincerely,
Gerard F. Scannell
Assistant Secretary
[Corrected 3/23/2009]

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace