Back to Federal guidance

Medical surveillance and training for emergency responders

Summary A company asked which emergency responders needed medical surveillance and training under interim HAZWOPER rules. OSHA said workers who only contained a release from a safe distance were outside the cited surveillance paragraph, while aggressive firefighters and emergency repair workers could be covered when hazardous substances were involved. It also explained interim training and the approaching final rule. OSHA now archives the letter as potentially outdated.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1989-05-23-2
Date issued
May 23, 1989
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA archives this letter and says it may no longer represent OSHA policy.
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA archives this letter and says it may no longer represent OSHA policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

May 23, 1989

Mr. Lanny E. Partain
Fire, Safety & Security Supervisor
Unocal Corporation
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Partain:

This is in response to a letter from Mr. Douglas L. Hazelwood from the Earth Technology Corporations on behalf of Unocal Corporation. This inquiry requests interpretations of specific provisions of OSHA's Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response interim final rule (29 CFR 1910.120). I apologize for the delay in this response. The great volume of correspondence has overwhelmed the staff and resulted in delayed responses to public inquiries.

The first question asks which of the following emergency response personnel are required under 29 CFR 1910.120 to be included in a medical surveillance program:

a. Employees who contain fires as opposed to taking aggressive action to fight fires?

b. Employees who take aggressive action to fight fires?

c. Employees that may be required to perform emergency repairs wearing self-contained breathing apparatus to protect against the inhalation of toxic vapors?

Employees in a. above are not covered by 29 CFR 1910.120(f) if their function is to contain the release from a safe distance. Regardless of 29 CFR 1910.120 coverage, employers are required under 29 CFR 1910.156(b)(2) to assure that employees who are expected to do interior structural fire fighting are physically capable of performing duties which may be assigned to them during emergencies.

Employees in b. and c. above are covered by 29 CFR 1910.120(f), as a result of 29 CFR 1910.120(l)(4)(ii), if incidents may involve hazardous substances as defined in 29 CFR 1910.120.

The second and final question concerns what training provisions under 29 CFR 1910.120 are applicable for a non-cleanup company that has an emergency response team that responds to releases of or substantial threats of releases of, hazardous substances on the company's property.

Under the interim final standard, at least 24 hours of annual training conducted on a monthly basis is required under 29 CFR 1910.120(l)(3). For further guidance, paragraph (q) of the final standard (copy attached) specifies various levels of training depending on the job functions of the employees. The final standard was issued March 6, 1989, and becomes effective March 6, 1990. OSHA in its enforcement discretion will not issue citations under the interim final rule if an employer is in compliance with the final standard.

I hope this information is helpful.

Sincerely,

Patricia K. Clark, Acting Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs
Enclosure

[Requester letter reproduced on OSHA page; omitted here.]

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace