Avoiding unsupported target-organ warnings on labels
Apply this to your situation
This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.
June 27, 1988
MEMORANDUM FOR: MICHAEL G. CONNORS
REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR
THROUGH: LEO CAREY, DIRECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF FIELD PROGRAMS
FROM: THOMAS J. SHEPICH, DIRECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS
SUBJECT: Overwarning on Hazard Labels
This is in response to your memorandum of May 18 on the above subject. Specifically, you wish to know whether it is acceptable under the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) for a company to use the same comprehensive list of health hazard target organs on the warning labels for an entire line of products.
Acceptability in terms of compliance with the HCS will depend upon whether, in fact, each product possesses all of the listed hazards. Any target organ hazard which is not demonstrated by at least one valid positive study for the chemical which is so labeled is not an appropriate hazard warning.
What does federal law require in your situation?
Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace