Horns and reverse alarms on bulldozers
Apply this to your situation
This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.
Robert Peyton, Director
Safety and Health Services
The Associate General Contractors of America
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Peyton:
This is in response to your letter of August 24, regarding the problems associated with the definition, application and use of the term "Horns" as used in 29 CFR 1926.602(a)(9)(i).
Our response to your questions is as follows:
- What is the definition of a "Horn" as used in 29 CFR 1926.602(a)(9)(i)?
A device sounded to provide a warning to employees exposed to the movement of the machine and the work being performed by the operator of the equipment.
- What is the difference between the term "Horn" and audible alarm?
The audible alarm will give an audible signal suitable for the job conditions. The audible signal will provide the alarm during the entire time of backward movement, the horn is only to be sounded as necessary.
- If a Bulldozer is equipped with a Bi Directional alarm is a horn required?
If a Bulldozer is equipped with a Bi Directional alarm 29 CFR 1926.602(a)(9)(i) which requires the horn is still enforced.
- If a signal man is used to direct equipment in forward motion is a "Horn" required?
If a signal man is used to direct equipment in forward motion 29 CFR 1926.602(a)(9)(i) which requires the horn is still enforced.
If we can be of further assistance, please let us know.
Sincerely,
Thomas J. Shepich, Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs
What does federal law require in your situation?
Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace