Back to Federal guidance

Formaldehyde cancer warnings before final rulemaking

Summary A formaldehyde industry group asked OSHA to delay cancer-warning enforcement while a formaldehyde rule was pending. OSHA declined, saying existing evidence of human carcinogenicity already required warning labels under the hazard communication standard. It said the pending rulemaking did not prejudge or suspend those duties.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1987-08-07
Date issued
August 7, 1987
Status
Active
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

August 7, 1987

Mr. John F. Murray
President
The Formaldehyde Institute, Inc.
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Murray:

This is in response to your letter regarding cancer warning labels for formaldehyde and products containing formaldehyde.

Although the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is conducting rulemaking with regards to formaldehyde and a final rule is due Fall 1987, it would be inappropriate to stay enforcement activities at this time for labeling requirements under the Hazard Communication Standard. The Hazard Communication Standard requires employers to evaluate the chemicals they produce and the information concerning their hazards be transmitted to affected employers and employees within the manufacturing sector.

Presently, there are several valid, positive studies indicating human carcinogenicity. Accordingly, label warnings stating the carcinogenic potential of formaldehyde is required under the Hazard Communication Standard and therefore is not, as you state, an ad hoc enforcement action by the Agency.

In addition, enforcement of labeling requirements under the Hazard Communication Standard will not prejudge the pending rulemaking. OSHA presently does not expect any final rule for formaldehyde to significantly change the information already required on existing labels.

If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me again.

Sincerely,
John A. Pendergrass
Assistant Secretary

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace