Numerical hazard labels in paint workplaces
Apply this to your situation
This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.
May 21, 1987
Mr. J. Andrew Doyle
Counsel
National Paint & Coatings Association
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Doyle:
This is in response to your letter of April 21 regarding the acceptability of the National Paint and Coatings Association's Hazardous Materials Information System (HMIS) for use in meeting the in-plant labeling requirements of the Hazard Communication Standard.
As you mention in your letter, page A-11 of Occupational Safety and Health Administration Instruction CPL 2-2.38A CH-1 states that "the intent of the standard is to permit the use of (numerical labeling systems) as long as the entire Hazard Communication Program is effective." Therefore, the use of the HMIS would be acceptable in meeting the in-plant labeling requirements of the standard. Of course, the system's user would need to correctly use the system (apply the correct numerical ratings) to be found in compliance.
In the case of shipped containers, a label must include the target organ effects. This information may be part of an additional label or added to the HMIS label. Also, in the case of shipped containers, the label must include the name and address of the chemical manufacturer, importer, or other responsible party.
If we can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact us again.
Sincerely,
Frank White
Deputy Assistant Secretary
What does federal law require in your situation?
Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace