Back to Federal guidance

Facial hair and tight-fitting respirator seals

Summary A requester asked whether workers with facial hair could use a particular tight-fitting air mask. OSHA said thick hair where the mask meets skin prevents the required seal, so an employer could not rely on that mask to protect those workers. OSHA later struck a separate passage about emergency-rescue training as outdated.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1986-08-18-0
Date issued
August 18, 1986
Status
Active
OSHA struck an emergency-rescue training passage on March 22, 1999 because it no longer reflected current policy; the posted letter retains the respirator-seal answer.
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

August 18, 1986

Mr. Jack Manning
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Manning:

This is in response to your letter of May 5 regarding respiratory protection.

We will begin by answering your second question and then will answer the remainder of your questions in the order that you asked them.

The MSA Model 401 Air Mask(TM) is a type of respirator mask that must form a seal with the wearer's skin in order to function at maximum effectiveness. Thick growths of hair where the mask edges meet the skin prevent the formation of a seal. Therefore, employers may not use this particular mask to protect employees who have thick hair growth at points where the seal with the skin is supposed to form. To do so would be a violation of 29 CFR [1910.134(g)(1)(i-iii)].

We can envision a chemical plant where the potential for accidental release of a toxic chemical is such as to warrant the providing of respirators for emergency use for the entire workforce. If that were the case and the employer chose to provide MSA Model 401 Air Masks for the employees, then as stated above, none of the employees may have thick hair growth at points where the seal with their skin is supposed to form.

In answer to all three parts of your third question, any time an employee is in a situation requiring respiratory protection and the respirator worn by the employee will not form a seal at some point where it is designed to do so the employer is put in the position of being in violation of 29 CFR [1910.134(g)(1)(i-iii)].

~~The amount and frequency of training to provide individuals assigned to conduct emergency rescue operations is whatever is necessary in order that the individuals attain and retain the ability to perform the associated duties and functions satisfactorily.~~

[This document was edited on 03/22/99 to strike information that no longer reflects current OSHA policy.]

We appreciate the opportunity to address your concerns. If you need our assistance again, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely,

John B. Miles, Jr., Director
Directorate of Field Operations

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace