Back to Federal guidance

Use of the M-17 military gas mask by civilian workers

Summary A state safety official asked whether civilian workers could use surplus M-17 military gas masks. OSHA said the mask lacked the required approval and could not be used for those workers, and it saw no basis for a variance. It also warned that old masks could have deteriorated and lacked replacement parts; OSHA later updated the approval references on its page.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1986-04-21
Date issued
April 21, 1986
Status
Active
OSHA struck references to MSHA approval and updated the cited certification rule in a March 22, 1999 edit; the posted letter retains the conclusion about the M-17 mask.
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

April 21, 1986

Mr. Derek Mullins
Supervisor
Compliance Industrial Hygiene
The Industrial Commission of Arizona
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Mullins:

This is in response to your letter of March 24, concerning the use of nonapproved M-17 gas masks.

The M-17 gas mask is used for the protection of army personnel against chemical warfare. The Mine Safety Appliance Company (MSA) was the principal manufacturer of the mask under contract with the Department of Defense. From my conversation with a technical representative of MSA, I learned that the production of the M-17 was terminated in the early seventies. Since the Defense Department owns the mold, MSA no longer stocks spare parts for this mask. Furthermore, this mask was made in accordance with specifications for military use. It may not pass the certification tests currently administered ~~jointly by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) and~~[by] the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) under the provisions of [42 CFR 84]. MSA does not recommend the use of this mask by civilians.

[This document was edited on 03/22/99 to strike information that no longer reflects current OSHA policy.]

Since the M-17 is not approved by ~~MSHA and~~ NIOSH, this respirator may not be used by workers other than enlisted military personnel. There are many approved gas masks available with modern design, improved construction materials, and with different types of canisters for protection against a wide variety of air contaminants. There is no reason for OSHA to accept the M-17 under a variance situation on the basis of unavailability. Furthermore, the currently available M-17 masks were manufactured at least ten years ago. The facepiece may have deteriorated and the sorbent probably has lost effectiveness over such a long storage time. Besides, users can no longer obtain spare parts and fresh canisters from MSA. Although the M-17 may be purchased at an attractive price as compared to the currently approved gas masks, the level of protection provided by this mask is questionable.

We hope we have addressed your concerns.

Sincerely,

Ching-tsen Bien
Supervisory Industrial Hygienist
Office of Science and
Technology Assessment

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace