Back to Federal guidance

Leaking ether systems and open-vessel rules

Summary An OSHA regional office asked whether a chemical process designed as closed still met the rule when seals and packings leaked. OSHA said the actual releases made the system an open-vessel system under the cited ether standards. It said the operation appeared to violate the open-vessel ban and the releases were reportable.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1986-02-20
Date issued
February 20, 1986
Status
Active
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

February 20, 1986

MEMORANDUM FOR: LINDA R. ANKU, REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR

FROM: JOHN B. MILES, JR., DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF FIELD OPERATIONS

SUBJECT: Some Clarifications of 29 CFR 1910.1006 and .1008

This is in response to your memorandum on this subject of January 28, 1986. We understand from a reading of your memorandum and telephone conversations with your staff, that Rohm and Haas Company is conducting some processes involving bis-chloromethyl ether and methyl chloromethyl ether in what they designed to be closed systems. According to 29 CFR 1910.1006(b)(4) and .1008(b)(4), a closed system is one that prevents the release of either of the two above mentioned ethers into regulated areas, nonregulated areas, or the external environment. We can see no way to improve upon this definition.

From telephone conversations held since receiving your memorandum, we understand that there are releases of the ethers due to deteriorating seals and packings. Moreover, releases would be greatly reduced by correcting the condition. Given these facts, it must be concluded that the systems, although designed as closed systems, have developed openings and become open-vessel systems. Rohm and Haas Company is thus allegedly violating 29 CFR 1910.1006(c)(3) and .1008(c)(3) which prohibit the operation of open vessel systems.

These releases of the ethers that are occurring due to the deteriorating seals and packings are incidents that must be reported by Rohm and Haas Company in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1006(f)(2) and .1008(f)(2).

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace