Back to Federal guidance

Compressed air pressure for cleaning

Summary A museum asked for a permanent variance to use compressed air above 30 psi while cleaning objects. OSHA explained that the outlet could have higher flowing pressure if a relief device reduced pressure below 30 psi when the flow was blocked, with appropriate protective equipment. OSHA said a variance was unnecessary on that basis.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1985-12-06
Date issued
December 6, 1985
Status
Active
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

Dec. 6, 1985
Dr. George J. Reilly
Coordinator and Head, Scientific Research
Winterthur Museum & Gardens
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Dr. Reilly:
Acting Assistant Secretary Patrick R. Tyson has asked me to respond to your letter dated November 25, requesting a permanent variance from Section 1910.242(b), Compressed air used for cleaning, of the Occupational Safety and Standards.

The enclosed copy of the OSHA Instruction STD 1-13.1 describes the intent and application of this standard. In short, the use of compressed air for cleaning purposes at pressures at or greater than 30 psi is permissible if the outlet or source is fitted with a relief device that drops the pressure to less than 30 psi if the flow is dead-ended. Appropriate personal protective equipment shall be worn as called for in the standard.
You will have to evaluate your procedures in terms of this directive. If I can be of any further assistance, please contact me at (202) 523-7193.
A variance from Section 1910.242(b) is unnecessary, therefore, no further action will be taken on your application.
Sincerely,
James J. Concannon
Director
Office of Variance Determination
Enclosure

[Requester letter and exhibit reproduced on OSHA page; omitted here.]

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace