Back to Federal guidance

Ground fault protection on construction extension cords

Summary A regional administrator asked how ground fault protection applied to extension cords plugged into permanent building outlets at construction sites. OSHA said the cord-end receptacles were generally treated as temporary outlets needing GFCI protection, but noted a Review Commission decision requiring evidence of an electric-shock hazard at the work location for enforcement. OSHA now archives the memorandum as potentially outdated.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1985-10-28-0
Date issued
October 28, 1985
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA archives this memorandum and says it may no longer represent OSHA policy.
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA archives this memorandum and says it may no longer represent OSHA policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

October 28, 1985


MEMORANDUM FOR: FRANK L. STRASHEIM
Regional Administrator

FROM: JOHN B. MILES, JR., Director
Directorate of Field Operations

SUBJECT: Applicability of (29 CFR 1926.400(h))
Ground-fault Protection Standards When
Extension Cords are Plugged into Permanent Wiring at Construction Sites

REFERENCE: Your November 25, 1984, Memorandum Requesting a
Clarification of 29 CFR 1926.400(h)


In the past we have made the interpretation under 29 CFR 1926.400(h)(2) that receptacle outlets which are part of the permanent wiring are not required to have GFCI. This did not meant that the employer could avoid the requirements simply by powering tools by means of extension cords from permanent receptacle outlets. Generally, extension cords are equipment used as temporary wiring (i.e., as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a building or structure) to provide power to areas remote from the permanent receptacle outlets. Therefore, we determined that the receptacles (or cord connectors) at the ends of such extension cords were receptacle outlets which are not a part of the permanent wiring of the building or structure and that a GFCI is required to protect employees.

A recent OSHRC decision will not support the aforementioned enforcement policy without substantiation that the hazards contemplated by the standard exist at the work location, thereby exposing employees to electric shock by providing a path to ground for current. These hazards would be present when employees are using electric tools in locations which provide a ready grounding path for current, such as damp or wet locations, outdoor areas, locations where building steel is present, areas where concrete slabs in contact with the earth are present, and other similar areas.

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace