Back to Federal guidance

Alternative guardrail designs and state plan rules

Summary An employer asked whether a variable railing arrangement could meet OSHA's general industry guardrail rule. OSHA said it could if it met the rule's top rail height, 200-pound strength, and intermediate protection criteria. It also told the employer to check state plan requirements where state rules differ; OSHA archives the letter.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1983-09-16
Date issued
September 16, 1983
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy.
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

September 16, 1983

Mr. Paul D. Kincheloe
Safety Director
PECO Industries, Inc.
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Kincheloe:

This in response to your letter of August 26, 1983, requesting a clarification of our railing requirements in 29 CFR 1910.23(e).

A variable arrangement system as mentioned in your correspondence would be acceptable if it meets the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.23(e)(3)(v)(a), (b), and (c), as follows:

(v) Other types, sizes, and arrangements of railing construction are acceptable provided they meet the following conditions:

(a) A smooth-surfaced top rail at a height above floor, platform, runway, or ramp level of 42 inches nominal;

(b) A strength to withstand at least the minimum requirement of 200 pounds top rail pressure;

(c) Protection between top rail and floor, platform, runway, ramp, or stair treads, equivalent at least to that afforded by a standard intermediate rail.

As you know, there are [25] State plan jurisdictions which administer their own occupational safety and health programs under approval and subject to monitoring by OSHA. These States must adopt occupational safety and health standards which are at least as effective as the corresponding Federal standards. Most of the [25] State plan jurisdictions adopt and enforce standards that are identical to the Federal. However, six of the states adopt and enforce at least some standards that are different from the Federal counterparts. These six States are: Alaska, California, Hawaii, Michigan, Oregon and Washington. For information on these States' specific requirements relative to 29 CFR 1910.23(e)(2)(v), you should contact them directly. The addresses and telephone numbers for all 24 of the State plan jurisdictions are listed in the enclosed directory.

If we may be of further assistance, please contact [the Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance at (202) 693-1850].

Sincerely,

John K. Barto
Chief, Division of Occupational
Safety Programming

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace