Back to Federal guidance

Equivalent injury recordkeeping forms for a railroad

Summary A railroad asked whether its own injury forms and procedures could satisfy OSHA's recordkeeping rules. OSHA found two forms equivalent and accepted the third if specified physician, hospital, report date, and employer-location details were added; it also reminded the railroad of completion, retention, and annual summary duties. OSHA archives the letter.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1983-05-25
Date issued
May 25, 1983
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy.
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

May 25, 1983

Mark E. Lichty
Consolidated Rail Corporation
[Recipient address omitted]
Re: OSHA Recordkeeping Requirements

Dear Mr. Lichty:

This letter is in response to your request for a determination of whether Conrail's forms and methods comply with OSHA recordkeeping requirements. You have submitted three forms, S-5, S-17, and CT-75C, and Conrail's instructions for compiling the S-5 and the S-17 forms.

Your request has been reviewed by my staff for compliance with the three basic OSHA recordkeeping forms, OSHA-101,102, and 200 and recordkeeping standards, 29 CFR 1904.2 - 1904.6. Our review has concluded that, with the minor clarification and additions detailed below, your procedures will be in full compliance with the requirements. Conrail's forms, S-5 and S-17, provide information equivalent to the OSHA-200 and the OSHA-102, respectively. The third form, CT-75C (personal injury form), will provide information equivalent to the OSHA-101 if the following information is added: (1) the address of the physician, (2) the hospital address, (3) date of the report, and (4) the location of the employer. Since 29 CFR 1904.2 and 1904.4 expressly permit the required information to be provided in an equivalent form, any Conrail facility maintaining S-5 and the CT-75C with the above additions will be in compliance with the requirement to maintain the OSHA-101 and the OSHA 200. Although no express provision for an equivalent form for the OSHA-102 is stated in 1904.5, the S-17 is sufficiently similar to constitute compliance with the requirement to maintain the OSHA-102. Accordingly, Conrail facilities maintaining the S-17 will be in compliance with the requirement to maintain the OSHA-102.

In reaching these conclusions, we assume that your forms will be kept in compliance with the other OSHA recordkeeping procedures not expressly set forth in your instructions. Both 1904.2 and 1904.4 require that the forms (S-5 and CT-75C) be completed within 6 working days after receiving information about a reportable injury. In addition, the S-17 and CT-75C forms are required under 1904.6 to be retained for a 5-year period. Conrail must also be cognizant of the requirements of 1904.5 regarding certifying the annual summary and providing that summary to employees not reporting to a fixed establishment on a regular basis.

A copy of this letter will be sent to relevant Area Directors.

Sincerely,
John B. Miles, Jr.
Field Coordination

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace