Back to Federal guidance

Later eye protection standard and visitor spectacles

Summary An Army officer asked about eye protection standards and visitor spectacles. OSHA said a later ANSI edition did not become an OSHA requirement without rulemaking, though the agency accepted products complying with a later consensus edition; it also said its law did not cover visitors who were not employees. OSHA archives the letter.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1982-07-30
Date issued
July 30, 1982
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy.
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

July 30, 1982

James W. Stout, O.D. CPT, MSC
Department of the Army
Occupational & Environmental Medicine Division
[Recipient address omitted]

Dear Captain Stout:

This is in response to your letter regarding eye protection.

In accordance with the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (the Act), the ANSI Z87.1-1979 standard can not become the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirement for eye protection until it is subjected to a formal rulemaking process. Because of other priorities, we do not have any plans in the near future for such a rulemaking. However, it is OSHA's policy to accept products which are in compliance with a later edition of a national consensus standard (see enclosed Field Directive CPL 2.11A).

Under the Act, OSHA is given the authority to protect employees from workplace hazards. However, the Act does not extend to persons not employed by a given company. Thus, OSHA does not have jurisdiction concerning visitors or "visitor's spectacles" worn by them.

Regarding the two models of eye protection that you mentioned in your letter, the Norton 180 model has been determined to provide protection equivalent to that afforded by eye protection meeting all of the requirements of ANSI Z87.1-1968. A copy of a letter stating this is enclosed for your information.

If you desire further information concerning eye protection, please contact Mr. Chappel D. Pierce of my staff. His telephone number is (202) 523-7216 (FTS: 523-7216).

Sincerely,
Barry J. White
Director,
Directorate of Safety Standards Programs

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace