Back to Federal guidance

Grain elevator inspection guidance for mixed facilities

Summary A company asked how OSHA's grain elevator inspection instruction applied to facilities with both grain handling and milling, and to several safety devices. OSHA said the instruction covered typical grain elevator equipment but not the milling operation, rejected an indirect belt slowdown detector, and answered other grain receiving questions. OSHA archives the letter; it also said at the time that the instruction might change.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1982-02-24
Date issued
February 24, 1982
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. The letter says OSHA might amend the instruction and intended to issue a grain elevator standard.
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. The letter says OSHA might amend the instruction and intended to issue a grain elevator standard. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

February 24, 1982

Mr. Terry Foppe
Safety Services Manager
Adolph Coors Company
[Recipient address omitted]

Dear Mr. Foppe:

Thank you for your letter of January 5, 1982, requesting an interpretation of OSHA Instruction CPL 2-1.4, Information on Grain Elevator Inspections. Your letter, addressed to Mr. Thomas Seymour, was forwarded to this office for reply.

The OSHA Instruction CPL 2-1.4 was preceded by the OSHA Grain Elevator Industry Hazard Alert, January 5, 1978 (copy enclosed). The Hazard Alert will be referred to in answering your questions. The following answers are numbered the same as your questions.

  1. The facilities included in the definition of "Grain Elevators" are indicated in the NFPA 61B-1980 standard, paragraphs 1-1.1 and A-1.1: viz., 1-1.1 This standard shall apply to all facilities designed for receiving, shipping, handling, and storing of bulk raw agricultural commodities. A-1-1 Such facilities include grain elevators, transfer facilities with or without storage capability, bulk storage buildings, and grain storage and handling facilities not involving further processing of agricultural commodities.
    Those grain handling facilities which have bucket elevators and other similar equipment found typically in a grain elevator are covered by the OSHA instruction. Where such facilities have other operations as well, such as milling operations, these operations are not covered by the instruction.

    The milling operation, covered by NFPA 61D, is not covered by OSHA Instruction CPL 2-1.4, whose title refers only to grain elevator inspections. This is further confirmed in our Hazard Alert. Appendix II, paragraph A.(1)(c), which directs the inspection team or the assigned compliance officer to utilize NFPA 61B.

  2. The method that you propose is an indirect one to sense leg belt slowdown by detecting a choke, which is only one cause of belt slowdown. It would not satisfy the requirement intended to detect all leg belt slowdowns from whatever cause such as where the belt begins to slip on the head pulley.

  3. The answer is "yes" for employee safety consideration if they are located away from typical work situations or employee frequented areas.
  4. The answer is "no". The requirement is directed to grain receiving areas before the bucket elevator - not processing machinery such as the scalperator. NFPA 61B-1980 states the following in paragraphs 5-2.2* and A-5-2.2:

    5-2.2* Grain receiving facilities shall be equipped with one or more devices such as grating, wire mesh screens, permanent magnets, approved electromagnets, pneumatic separators, or specific gravity separators.
    A-5-2.2 Such devices should be installed on hoppers, conveyors or spouts handling grain from truck dump pits, rail car dump pits, and barge or ship unloading systems prior to entry of the grain into subsequent conveyors, elevators, or processing machinery to minimize the entry of tramp metal and other foreign objects.
    Furthermore, the Grain Elevator Industry Hazard Alert, page 5, emphasizes that it is generally believed that the bucket elevator is the location in the grain elevator complex in which fires most frequently occur, with one ignition source being tramp metal.

In closing, it is important that you be aware of the following items that may impact your questions and our answers:

  1. OSHA may amend CPL 2-1.4 in the near future, and
  2. OSHA intends to promulgate a grain elevator standard.

Should you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to call or write.

Sincerely,
John K. Barto
Chief,
Division of Occupational Safety Programming

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace