Back to Federal guidance

Hard-hat duties and employer policy

Summary An employee asked whether OSHA could intervene over a company hard-hat rule when no head hazard existed. OSHA said its standards did not require hard hats without an exposure to possible head injury, though an employer could choose a stricter policy. OSHA said it had no jurisdiction over the resulting internal employment dispute.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1977-11-30-1
Date issued
November 30, 1977
Status
Active
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

November 30, 1977

Mr. Lawrence E. Speece
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Speece:

Mr. Wilson has asked me to respond to your letter dated August 29, 1977, regarding the Elliott Company's plant-wide hard hat program. We are pleased to learn that you found the information illuminating in our reply dated August 16, 1977.

In reference to your quotation from the letter dated August 16, 1977, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration can cite an employer for using his judgement in not requiring the use of hard hats when a hazard obviously exists, but can not cite for exercising judgement in requiring the use of hard hats when there is obviously no hazard. Nevertheless, between these two obvious extremes, a grey area often exists in matters of this sort where it is more prudent to be protected than to be surprised without protection. However, as mentioned in our letter, when employees are not exposed to possible head injuries, head protection is not required by the OSHA standards 29 CFR 1910.132(a) and 1910.135, which then becomes solely a matter of employment conditions existing between the employer and his employees, and where applicable, subject to any labor/management contractual agreement. As a final statement to your request for our opinion and advice, OSHA would have no jurisdictional right to intervene in such a case as you personally experienced for failure to wear the hard hat contrary to company policy.

As far as "good sound legal advice" is concerned on the subject matter, the preceding paragraph explains OSHA's position as related to the standards involved. Further than that, OSHA is in no position whatever to give legal advice. As you know, it is standard practice for employees with grievances on internal problems to petition for relief from management or to turn to their unions or bargaining group for advise and possible resolution.

I hope this additional information will be helpful to you. If I may be of any further assistance, please feel free to contact me.

Sincerely,
John K. Barto, Chief
Division of Occupational
Safety Programming

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace