Back to Federal guidance

Rollover protection for newer construction machines

Summary An OSHA construction-standards office clarified which rollover-protection criteria applied to newer machines. It said criteria meant for pre-September 1972 machines should not be used for current production, and new installations had to meet the standards applicable to each machine type. The page references attachments available only in print.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1977-04-07
Date issued
April 7, 1977
Status
Active
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

April 7, 1977

MEMORANDUM TO: Gabe Gillotti, Office of Field Coordination
FROM: David Hadden, Office of Construction Safety Standards
THRU: Allan E. Martin and John Proctor, Office of Standards
SUBJECT: Misapplication of Rollover Protective Structures (ROPS) Criteria of 29 CFR 1926.1000(b).

Several inquiries and contacts with this office indicate that ROPS criteria for machines built prior to September 1, 1972 are being used to design ROPS for machines of current production. This practice is contrary to the standard as written.

The criteria for ROPS structures applied to machines manufactured on or after September 1, 1972 is 29 CFR 1926.1001 or .1002 for the specific machine types mentioned respectively except that all rubber-tired loaders or dozers are required to be fitted with ROPS designed in accordance with the criteria of 29 CFR 1926.1001 (See 1926.1002(j)(2)).

Although some machines manufactured since September 1, 1972 reportedly have been fitted with ROPS which are designed to Corps of Engineers, California or 29 CFR 1926.1000(c)(2) criteria instead of the required criteria, the reports received to date do not indicate that replacement with ROPS of the correct criteria is warranted by recognized deficiencies. However, ROPS of the correct design criteria should be required for all machines fitted with ROPS from this time on. This does not appear to affect the agencies de minimus position regarding ROPS designed to SAE J1040a criteria of FIM #76-29.

A copy of FIM #76-29 and the 1928 Subpart C are attached for your convenience. This concern may be related to the agriculture tractors where ROPS are applied by other than the original tractor manufacturer.

(For Attachments, see printed copy)

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace