Back to Federal guidance

Vinyl-chloride releases and protective equipment

Summary A materials company asked what counted as a massive vinyl-chloride release and when protective gear was needed. OSHA described visible pressurized gas, spray, cloud, or ice-clump conditions rather than a fixed concentration. It said protective equipment was needed during releases, lingering contamination, and unpredictable release risk.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1977-03-24
Date issued
March 24, 1977
Status
Active
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

March 24, 1977

Mr. Michael F. Dolan
Industrial Hygienist
Vulcan Materials Company
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Dolan:

This is in response to your letter of October 4, 1976, in which you requested clarification of several parts of 29 CFR 1910.1017, the Vinyl Chloride Standard.

"Massive release" of vinyl chloride as used in 1910.1017(b)(5) to define "emergency" means a physically imposing and impressive gaseous release irrespective of considerations of toxicity. Typical concentrations associated with a massive release of vinyl chloride cannot be pinned down because of the diverse nature of the surroundings in which they may occur. Massive release of vinyl chloride is recognized by the event of gaseous vinyl chloride escaping under positive pressure with concomitant liquid vinyl chloride spray generation, and/or cloud formation, and/or ice clump formation at the point of escape.

A massive release of vinyl chloride is regarded as an emergency because it creates a potential for fire and/or explosion, and/or for acute toxication of employees, and/or for predisposing employees to future development of disease such as cancer.

In order to clarify the term "hazardous release" used in 1910.1017(i)(1), the clause it is used in must be explained. The clause establishes one of the provisions that must be included in a written operational plan for emergency situations. Specifically, the plan must require employees used to combat emergencies or to correct existing massive releases of vinyl chloride to be equipped in accordance with paragraph 1910.1017(h). More precise terminology might have been used in 1910.1017(i)(1), i.e., "emergencies" instead "hazardous operations" and "massive releases" instead of "hazardous releases."

The protective equipment required for employees engaged in hazardous operations needs to be worn during the release of vinyl chloride, during the period that the air in their work space remains contaminated with vinyl chloride, and during periods where there is a potential for the release of vinyl chloride to suddenly and unpredictably occur.

I hope you find the information provided helpful.

Sincerely,
Richard P. Wilson,
Deputy Director Federal
Compliance and State Programs

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace