Back to Federal guidance

Protective equipment and stricter employer rules

Summary An employee asked about being required to wear protective equipment. OSHA said its rules required gear when it could prevent a reasonably probable injury. A company could also impose equipment rules beyond OSHA’s minimum, an employment condition OSHA could not judge without the specific facts.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1976-12-02
Date issued
December 2, 1976
Status
Active
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

December 2, 1976
Mr. Robert G. Patterson
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Patterson:
This is in response to your correspondence of November 13, 1976, concerning Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations governing the use of personal protective equipment.
The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 and its standards require that personal protective equipment be used when there is a reasonable probability of injury that can be prevented by such equipment. The use of personal protective equipment under conditions not required by OSHA standards is solely a matter of employment conditions existing between an employer and his employees. Many employers make compliance with certain work rules, which may include the wearing of personal protective equipment, a condition of employment even if there is no OSHA requirement. It may be of benefit to you to discuss this situation with your employer.
Failure to wear personal protective equipment can affect the safety of other workers at the same location. A worker injured because of his failure to have or use protective equipment could easily create a situation hazardous to his fellow workers. Good examples would be injured crane or tow motor operators.
As you did not provide the name of your employer, OSHA cannot comment with specificity on your situation. However, if you would like to discuss the matter in more detail, personnel from the OSHA office serving your locale would be happy to meet with you. The address and telephone number of that office follow:

[USDOL OSHA, Pittsburgh Area Office
Federal Office Building, Room 1428
1000 Liberty Avenue
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-4101
Phone: (412) 395-4903
Fax: (412) 395-6380]

If I may be of any further assistance, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Richard P. Wilson, Acting Director,
[Directorate of Cooperative and State Programs]
[Corrected 10/22/2004]

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace