Back to Federal guidance

Employer responsibility for safety rules and protective equipment

Summary A senator asked about worker compliance with safety rules and use of protective gear. OSHA said the Act placed compliance responsibility on employers, gave OSHA no sanctions against employees, and called for protective equipment when it could prevent a reasonably probable injury. OSHA archives the letter.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1976-08-11
Date issued
August 11, 1976
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy.
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

August 11, 1976
Honorable Lawton Chiles
United States Senate
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Senator Chiles:
This is in response to the communication from your office, dated July 16, 1976, referring to [illegible in source], Mr. Artis A. King, Lake Worth, Florida.
The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (copy enclosed) assigns the responsibility for compliance with safety and health standards to the employer and contains no sanctions which OSHA can enforce against the employee. The employer provides supervision and instructions to his employees to ensure that work is completed in a timely and proper manner. This same supervision should ensure that employees have, and use, safe tools and equipment. In many companies, adherence to safety and health rules is a condition of employment. Employee disregard for these rules is treated with the usual management practice for each company.
Under the Act, and its standards, personal protective equipment must be used when there is reasonable probability of injury that can be prevented by such protective equipment. Employees, when not subject to such probable injury or illness, are not required to be so protected.
I am enclosing a copy of the Occupational Safety and Health Standards applicable to general industry. 29 CFR 1910.132(a), page 23670, outlines the general requirements for personal protective equipment. 29 CFR 1910.135, page 23673, provides specific requirements for occupational head protection.
If I may be of any further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Pursuant to your request, the enclosures are herewith returned.
Sincerely,
Bert M. Concklin
Deputy Assistant Secretary
Enclosures

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace