Back to Federal guidance

When a locker room needs a second exit

Summary A paper machinery company asked whether a locker and washroom needed more than one exit. OSHA said its rule did not automatically require two: occupancy, fire risk, and similar hazards governed whether another exit was needed. It also suggested checking local building codes. OSHA archives the letter.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1976-08-09
Date issued
August 9, 1976
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy.
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

August 9, 1976

Mr. Robert C. Harris
Manager of Personnel
Beloit Corporation
Paper Machinery Div.
[Recipient address omitted]

In re: Your letter dated July 30, 1976,
Means of Egress 1910.36

Dear Mr. Harris:

Your letter to Milwaukee Area Director Robert Hanna has been referred to this office for response.

Your letter asks if a locker - washroom in your plant requires more than one means of egress. OSHA standard 1910.36(b)(8) reads as follows:

"Every building or structure, section, or area thereof of such size, occupancy, and arrangement that the reasonable safety of numbers of occupants may be endangered by the blocking of any single means of egress due to fire or smoke, shall have at least two means of egress remote from each other, so arranged as to minimize any possibility that both may be blocked by any one fire or other emergency conditions."

This paragraph does not automatically require at least two means of egress; a second (or more) means of egress would be required if the area were occupied by a large number of employees, or if hazardous processes were being carried out, or for similar reasons.

We suggest you ascertain if local building codes require additional means of egress.

Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.

Very truly yours,

EDWARD J. LARGENT
Assistant Regional Administrator
for Technical Support

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace