Denied variance for unguarded firebrick cutoff saw
Apply this to your situation
This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.
NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.
May 14, 1976
Mr. Thomas Wunderlich
Hot End Superintendent
C-E Glass
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Wunderlich:
This is in response to your letter dated April 5, 1976, in which you request a variance form Section 1910.212(a)(3)(iii) Machine Guarding, Point of Operation Guarding, of the Occupational Safety and Health Standards.
In your operation you are using a straight line pull cutoff saw equipped with a diamond tip blade for cutting firebrick. You state that the upper portion of the blade is guarded and although the lower or cutting edge is not guarded the proper training and usage provides safe employment for your employees.
A careful study has been made of your request and we have concluded that a hazard does exist when cutting is conducted without the necessary guarding. The primary purpose of the guarding is to protect the operator from pieces of a broken blade, flying material, and inadvertent contact with the blade with any part of the body.
We suggest you investigate the feasibility of installing a hinged (floating) hood guard for this operation. These guards are relatively simple to fabricate and are often readily available from the various saw manufacturers.
The requirements of 29 CFR 1905.11(b)(4) are that the conditions, practices, means, methods, operations, or processes used or proposed to be used would provide employment and places of employment to employees which are as safe and healthful as those required by the standard from which a variance is sought.
It appears that you are requesting an exemption from the standard rather than meeting the requirements for a variance. This is not permitted. Your request for a variance from Section 1910.212(a)(3)(iii) is denied without prejudice to the filing of another application.
Affected employees and their authorized representatives shall be notified of the denial of your application in the same manner they were informed of your request for a variance.
Any further questions you may have regarding this matter may be addressed to our Camden Area Office, U.S. Department of Labor - OSHA, 519 Federal Street, Room 408, Camden, New Jersey 08101, telephone 609-757-5181.
Sincerely,
Barry J. White
Associate Assistant Secretary
for Regional Programs
What does federal law require in your situation?
Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace