Back to Federal guidance

Warehouse passage as a means of egress

Summary A pump manufacturer asked whether a route through a warehouse could serve nearby buildings. OSHA described how exit signs, alternate exits, occupancy, and passage width affected the arrangement and said an inspector would assess the site. OSHA archives the letter.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1975-12-18-0
Date issued
December 18, 1975
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy.
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

December 18, 1975

Mr. Richard P. Landers
Manager Labor Relations
Gould Pumps, Inc.
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Landers:

This is in response to your letter requesting a clarification of OSHA standards on means of egress.

Reviewing the OSHA standards 1910.35, 1910.36 and 1910.37, we find significant passages which specify exactly how means of egress shall be located and identified. 1910.35(a) defines a means of egress an a continuous and unobstructed way of exit travel in vertical and horizontal plans. 1910.36(b)(1) requires exits sufficient to permit prompt escape not dependent solely on any single safeguard. 1910.36(b)(5) requires that exits and means of exit shall be clearly identified and those doors or corridors not leading directly to an exit discharge shall be identified by signs or other means as "Not an Exit" or similar wording. Table El (page 23532 of Federal Register dated June 27, 1974 Volume 39 #125) requires that space occupied by 60 or less persons shall have passages 30 to 44 inches wide and space occupied by 100 or more persons shall be provided with passageways greater than 44 inches.

All interpretations of OSHA standards are subject to the compliance officer's evaluation while making a physical inspection of a premises. However, assembling the preceding information, we find the following as one of several means of complying with OSHA standards: (a) passage through the warehouse area could be permitted if the entry door is identified as "Not an Exit" and there are at least two additional means of egress from each of the buildings mentioned in your letter, (b) if not more than 60 persons occupy the adjoining buildings, the passageway would meet the OSHA standard of 36 inches minimum, but if occupied by more than 60 persons (75 persons by your letter), the passageway and entry doors would have to meet part (a) of this paragraph.

We have mailed several OSHA brochures including the Federal Register noted above under separate cover.

Sincerely,
Alfred Barden
Assistant Regional Director
Occupational Safety and Health

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace