Back to Federal guidance

Trenching soils and first-aid access at construction sites

Summary A contractors' association asked how several excavation and first-aid provisions applied. OSHA said limestone or granite could still need shoring depending on site conditions, described factors that could make ground move, and said reasonable first-aid access depended on hazards, distance, traffic, and medical judgment. OSHA archives the letter.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1975-11-18
Date issued
November 18, 1975
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy.
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

November 18, 1975

Mr. William F. Driskill
Assistant Executive Director
The Associated General
Contractors of America, Incorporated
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Driskill:

This is in response to your letter of July 18, 1975, addressed to Mr. C. R. Holder, requesting clarification of certain Construction Standards. It also confirms your telephone conversation with a member of my staff.

Most of your requests for clarification of excavations, trenching, and shoring standards have no clear-cut answers. This is unfortunate in some respects and future revisions relating to trenching and excavations standards shall be addressed to more definite wording.

I will attempt at answer each question in the same numerical order as asked.

(1) 1926.652(c) - Solid limestone or granite does not meet the accepted definition (geological) of soil, not withstanding OSHA's definition of "hard compact soil" in 1926.653(h).

Table P-1. - Limestone or granite may require shoring if certain conditions prevail. Such determination must be a job-site determination on an, "as found at time of exposure" basis.

(2) OSHA does not have a definition of what "average soils" are in its standards. As used in Table P-1 "average soils" appears to be between compacted angular gravels and compacted sharp sand. Inversely, from Table P-1, "average soil" has an approximate angle of repose of 45o.

(3) 1926.651(c) - OSHA considers "danger from moving ground" to ground that is "at rest" and can by some reasonable cause change its location. Some reasonable causes may be: possible variation in water content of the ground; changes in ground from exposure to air, sun, water, or freezing; loading imposed by structures, equipment, overlying material, or stored material, and vibrations from equipment, blasting, traffic, or other sources.

(4) 1926.652(e) - The only answer that OSHA can offer to your allegation that "this section is used in many citations when an employer is accused of not shoring" is that the Area Director that issued the citation concluded that evidence warranted an alleged violation of this standard. Every employer is required to take certain precautions prior to opening an excavation. This may not involve shoring or bracing. That is the reason for the word "additional".

(5) 1926.50(c) - OSHA considers "reasonable accessible in terms of time and distance" to be based on several factors, including the work hazards, the consulting physician's opinion, highway traffic etc. Each situation would have to be evaluated separately.

If I may be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me.

Sincerely,
John K. Barto, Chief
Division of Occupational Safety Programming

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace