Back to Federal guidance

Air recirculation in spray-finishing operations

Summary An equipment supplier asked about an advertisement for electronic air cleaners used near spray finishing. OSHA said the rule barred recirculating spray exhaust and required contaminated air removal and outside replacement air. An electronic precipitator was not itself objectionable if all other requirements were met and it created no extra hazard.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1975-10-02
Date issued
October 2, 1975
Status
Active
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

October 2, 1975

Mr. Frank Fatta
District Manager
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Fatta:

This is in response to your letter referring to an advertisement for "Electronic Air Cleaners", and reviewing several hazards in spray finishing operations.

The OSHA Standard 1910.107(d)(9) does state in part "...Air exhausted from spray operations shall not be recirculated." However, the flyer you enclosed in your letter merely advises of the availability of an electronic air cleaner. It in no way directly states that it meets OSHA standards and neither directly or indirectly refers to removal of all air contaminants. The cartoon infers that particulate matter is removed to preclude damage to products, not people. When a premises is inspected by an OSHA compliance officer, the standards of air purity and spray booth operation are applied fully. This includes removal of contaminated air, replacement by external air sources and the purity and temperature of incoming air. If a spray operation uses electronic precipitators as well as all the other required equipment, there would be no OSHA objection unless such precipitator created an additional hazard.

Please feel free to contact us if there are further questions about OSHA.

Sincerely,

Alfred Baden
Assistant Regional Director
Occupational Safety and Health

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace