Back to Federal guidance

Pivoting ladder at an emergency exit elevation change

Summary A manufacturer requested a variance for an emergency exit with a 35-inch change in elevation. OSHA said its pivoting fixed ladder appeared to meet the cited rule's intent, so no variance was required. OSHA edited part of the archived text in 2004 after revising the exit-route standard.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1975-08-12
Date issued
August 12, 1975
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. On February 5, 2004, OSHA struck text that no longer reflected policy after revising 29 CFR 1910 Subpart E in 2002.
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. On February 5, 2004, OSHA struck text that no longer reflected policy after revising 29 CFR 1910 Subpart E in 2002. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

August 12, 1975
Mr. LaVern W. Cass
Corporate Safety Director
Northern Engraving Company
Luxco Incorporated
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Cass:
This is in response to your letter dated July 24, 1975, which supplied additional information relative to your request for variance from Section [1910.37(a)(3)] ~~Means of Egress - Changes in Elevation,~~ of the Occupational Safety and Health Standards.
[This document was edited on 02/05/2004 to strike information that no longer reflects current OSHA policy. 29 CFR 1910 Subpart E was revised on November 7, 2002. This section is now titled "Exit Routes - Maintenance, safeguards, and operational features for exit routes.]
Your request for a variance from the means of egress guarding requirements of the above standard has been carefully evaluated by our technical staff and we have concluded that a variance is not required.
You have stated that a remote exit located in the Northwest corner of your building "B" has a 35" elevation change from plant floor to grade. This door is not used as a normal means of egress due to the presence of a railroad abutting the building. Although not required, this door could be used as an emergency exit.
The above standard requires that ["Stairs or a ramp must be provided where the exit route is not substantially level."] Your installation of the special purpose pivoting fixed ladder would appear to meet the intent of this standard. Therefore, a variance is not required.
No further action will be taken on your request for a variance from Section [1910.37(a)(3)].
Sincerely,
Barry J. White
Associate Assistant
Secretary for Regional Programs

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace