Citing a violation while an earlier citation is contested
Apply this to your situation
This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.
July 2, 1975
MEMORANDUM FOR: David H. Rhone
Assistant Regional Director for Occupational Safety and Health
Subject: Multi-Plant Employers
I concur with your premise that a violation of a standard should be cited even though that company has a previous citation contested. As stated in paragraph B.5.d., Chapter VIII, of the Field Operations Manual for repeated violations: Where a violation of a previously cited condition is apparent and the first violation has been contested and has not yet become a final order of the Review Commission, the second violation should nevertheless be cited. Such a citation is automatically rescinded if the prior citation does not become a final order of the Review Commission. Your suggestion to make this applicable to all violations will be included in a change to the FOM.
Care should be taken to assure that a determination is made whether the violation is an occurrence at a separate establishment of the same company or a repeat violation at a previously cited establishment. Reference paragraph 5.B.e., Page 12, Chapter VIII of the FOM; and 29 CFR 1903.2(b).
Barry J. White
Associate Assistant Secretary for
Regional Programs
What does federal law require in your situation?
Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace