Back to Federal guidance

Fire-extinguishing systems in spray booths

Summary An insurer asked how spray-booth filter and fire-protection rules worked together. OSHA said approved dry-chemical or carbon-dioxide systems could substitute for sprinklers in the cited setting, explained when full-booth coverage was needed, and distinguished a proposed rule from then-current requirements. OSHA archives the letter.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1975-05-30
Date issued
May 30, 1975
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy.
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

May 30, 1975
Mr. Len Bower
Loss Control Consultant
Johnson and Higgins of Arizona
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Bower:
This is in reply to our telephone conversation of May 22, 1975 requesting an additional interpretation of spray finishing operations as it relates to fire protection systems.
Section 1910.107(b)(5)(iv) requires that the space on the downstream and upstream sides of the filters within spray booths shall be protected with approved automatic sprinklers. Our interpretation of this standard is as follows:

  1. Field Information Memorandum (FIM) #75-26 states that a dry chemical extinguishing system installed so as to conform to 1910.160 or a carbon dioxide system installed so as to conform to 1910.161 (see the enclosed copy) may be used in place of an automatic sprinkler system.
  2. The purpose of this standard is to provide an automatic extinguishing system for the filter media. The upstream and downstream protection is meant to cover both sides of the filter media and not the entire booth or duckwork. However, 1910.107(f)(1) says that in sprinklered buildings, the entire spray booth has to be sprinklered and in unsprinklered buildings where there is at least one sprinkler head in a booth, the "sprinkler heads shall be located to effect water distribution throughout the entire booth." If a dry chemical or a carbon dioxide system is installed, it would also have to distribute its extinguishing material throughout the entire booth.
  3. If the filter media is removed and baffle plates installed, an automatic extinguishing system is not required by this particular standard. The Environment Protection Agency (EPA) regulations should be checked into however, since OSHA only has jurisdiction over employee protection.
  4. The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 33-1973 requires all spraying areas to be protected with an approved automatic fire extinguishing system. We are proposing in our latest draft of 1910.107 to require an automatic extinguishing system in all spray booths where employees are required to be inside of during spraying operations. This would exclude bench type booths and most of the automatic type booths.
    In conclusion, if the building is sprinklered, or dry filters or filter rolls are used, or there is at least one fixed automatic extinguishing system head or nozzle in the booth, or fixed electrostatic apparatus is being used, or organic peroxides or other dual components coatings being used, the entire spray booth must be protected by a fixed extinguishing system, and the revision of 1910.107 may require automatic extinguishing systems in almost all spray booths.
    If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
    Sincerely,
    Terence P. Smith
    Safety Specialist
    Enclosure

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace