Back to Federal guidance

Measuring ventilation at plating-tank hoods

Summary A steel company asked how to check airflow at plating tanks where some ducts were lined. OSHA described hood-edge measurements, contaminant sampling, and a modified Pitot tube, while later striking its statement about a table's exhaust rates as outdated. OSHA archives the edited letter.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1975-05-29
Date issued
May 29, 1975
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. OSHA struck an exhaust-rate sentence on June 1, 1999, because it no longer reflected current policy.
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. OSHA struck an exhaust-rate sentence on June 1, 1999, because it no longer reflected current policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

May 29, 1975
Mr. J. L. Wentz,
General Supervisor - Safety
Midwest Steel Division of
National Steel Corporation
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Wentz:
Your letter of May 5, 1975 requests an interpretation of the requirements of Section [1910.124(j)(1) and (j)(2)]. The following information was secured from the Standards Division:
"Initially, during installation, provisions should have been made for a Pitot Tube traverse of the duct. At present, since some of the ducts are lined, air flow measurements can be made with a calibrated velometer, or heated thermoanemometer across the hood entry and edges of the tank. ~~Exhaust ventilation rates must meet the requirements of Table G-15."~~
[This document was edited on 06/01/99 to strike information that no longer reflects current OSHA policy.]
You are reminded that the air flows are for undisturbed locations. Higher airflows may be required to compensate for excessive cross drafts. Air sampling for a specific contaminant is one means of evaluating effectiveness of the air exhaust system.
A modified Pitot Tube does exist which consists of two tubes joined laterally (approx. 1/2" D x 1" wide). This permits straight entry into a duct. A 2" threaded sleeve welded onto the duct is the permanent entry (when not in use - a threaded cap closes the opening).
If you have additional questions pertaining to the matter above, please feel free to contact this office.
Very truly yours,
EDWARD J. LARGENT,
Associate Assistant
Regional Director for
Technical Support

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace