Back to Federal guidance

Low doorways and a de minimis exit-route notice

Summary A tannery requested a variance for two low doorways on exit routes. OSHA reviewed other exits, padding, warning signs, and limited occupancy, then said the condition could receive a de minimis notice and took no further action on the variance. The archived page notes a 2004 correction.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1975-05-01-0
Date issued
May 1, 1975
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. The page notes a February 4, 2004 correction.
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. The page notes a February 4, 2004 correction. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

May 1, 1975
Mr. James Hahn
Plant Manager
Cudahy Tanning Company, Inc.
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Hahn:
This is in reference to your application for a variance from [29 CFR 1910.36(g)(1)] of the Occupational Safety and Health Standards.
You have stated that two doorways, one leading to the lunch-locker room and one to the third floor of the plant, are 5' 6" in height. The top purlin of these doorways have been padded with ½" to ¾" foam rubber, painted yellow, and signs reading "Danger, Low Clearance, Watch Your Head" have been posted on each side of these purlins. You have also stated that these are not the only [exit routes] from these two areas.
As you know, a visit was made to your workplace for the purpose of obtaining first-hand information concerning the doorways. This report confirms that there are four exits from the second floor and three from the third floor. In addition, each floor has an elevator with two exits flanking it. The second floor lunchroom is used by approximately 35 employees and the third floor area is used by 10 employees. The secondary use of the doorways, the fact that the top purlins of the doorways are padded and warning signs are posted, and the small number of employees involved indicates that the low doorways do not affect the safety and health of the employees.
In such a situation an Area Director has the authority to issue a de minimis notice of violation. A de minimis notice carries no penalty and requires no abatement. The report from the Regional Office contained a recommendation that, as long as the padding, signs, and occupancy continue as they are, the violation be termed de minimis.
Accordingly, no further action will be taken on your request for a variance. The interim order which was granted is now moot.
Sincerely,
Barry J. White
Associate Assistant Secretary for
Regional Programs
[Corrected 2/4/2004]

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace