Ground crews beneath hovering helicopters
Apply this to your situation
This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.
November 20, 1974
MEMORANDUM FOR: MR. JIM LAKE
Subject: Interpretation of 1926.551(i), "Hooking and Unhooking Loads from Hovering Helicopters"
This memorandum is being written at your request to clarify what is apparently a misunderstanding concerning the interpretation of the above standard.
Accordingly, our interpretation is as follows:
Implicit in the phrasing in the adverb clause beginning the first sentence of the standard 1926.551(i), i.e., "When employees are required to perform work under hovering craft..." it is contemplated that employees will, in fact, be required under certain circumstances to perform work under hovering aircraft. Illustrative of these circumstances are situations involving guiding the load and securing the load prior to disengaging the lifting mechanism (slings, hooks, etc.) from the craft.
The last sentence of the aforementioned standard is interpreted to mean that securing the load is necessity prior to unhooking the load carried by the aircraft.
Please advise Mr. Jim Whitt, Deputy Commissioner of Labor and Industry (907/586, 3005), Mr. Larry Hanna, attorney for the Helicopter Association of America (206/682, 8770), and any other interested parties that workplace situations (as described to the National Office by Mr. Granchi of your office, Mr. Bailey of your office, Mr. Whitt and Mr. Hanna) do not indicate that the above referenced standard was violated.
The facts as related by the above four sources to the Office of Compliance Programming and the Office of Standards were that a helicopter lift was being effected to transport to the worksite and to lower and install power distribution towers. This required that a ground crew position and secure the tower onto its base while the tower is suspended form a hovering helicopter prior to disengagement of the sling and hook.
This interpretation has been concurred in by Don Shay and Bud Joyce, Office of Compliance Programming, Mr. Frank Memmott, Office of Standards, and Baruch Fellner, Office of the Associate Solicitor for Occupational Safety and Health.
Barry J. White
Associate Assistant Secretary for
[OSHA's online text ends with an incomplete title.]
What does federal law require in your situation?
Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace