Back to Federal guidance

Federal position on remote unemployment claimstaking

Summary ETA said its grants for telephone initial claims did not require states to adopt remote claimstaking as their single service method or imply that remote service was preferable to in-person service. It said states were better placed to assess the methods that served their claimants and employers, while acknowledging that unemployment insurance could participate in One-Stop centers in person or remotely. ETA now labels the letter Canceled.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA)
Document number
UIPL No. 37-97
Date issued
July 28, 1997
Status
Withdrawn
ETA labels this advisory Canceled, and its listed expiration was December 31, 1998.
Status last verified October 25, 2026

Is this still the rule?

This document has been withdrawn. Ezel checks what federal law requires today, under current federal labor law, and answers your situation with citations.

This document has been withdrawn
ETA labels this advisory Canceled, and its listed expiration was December 31, 1998. It no longer reflects the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE PROGRAM LETTER NO. 37-97

Subject: The Department of Labor's Position on the Utilization of Telephone and Other Electronic Methods of Claimstaking in the Unemployment Insurance (UI) Program.

Purpose: To advise State Employment Security Agencies (SESAs) of the Department's position on the use of telephone and other electronic methods of claimstaking.

References: Unemployment Insurance Program Letter (UIPL) No. 35-95; UIPL No. 5- 97; UIPL No. 38-96 and UIPL No. 38-96, Change 1.

Background: In support of SESAs' decisions to implement remote initial claimstaking, a series of planning grants and implementation grants were provided during Fiscal Year (FY) 1996. Implementation grants were also awarded in FY 1997. Additional implementation grants may be offered next fiscal year if funds are appropriated for such use. Due to the limited funds available, the grants are being awarded on a competitive basis and are limited to financing one-time implementation costs for acquisition of telecommunications equipment and related services. The Department's interpretation of several Federal requirements in a remote claimstaking environment was issued in UIPLs No. 35-95 and No. 5-97, dated June 28, 1995 and December 2, 1996, respectively. In addition, the Department issued UIPL No. 38-96, dated September 26, 1996, and UIPL No. 38-96, Change 1, dated January 7, 1997, to advise SESAs of changes to the Interstate Statistical Data Exchange format and data exchange instructions. However, additional questions have been raised about the Department's position concerning the use of telephones and other remote means for initial claimstaking as an alternative, or in addition to in-person claimstaking, as well as the impact of such remote initial claimstaking on a State's One- Stop Career Center concept. This directive contains the Department's position.

Department's Position: The Department will continue to assist SESAs in implementing systems that are technologically feasible and efficient in an effort to deliver quality services to claimants. However, the Telephone Claims Implementation Grants are not an attempt to dictate a single method of service delivery for the SESA, nor does the Department's support imply that the transition to remote claimstaking is considered more desirable than in-person service delivery. The Department recognizes that SESAs are better situated to assess the methods that best serve their claimant and employer needs. The FY 1996 and 1997 Telephone Initial Claims Implementation Grants announcements advised SESAs that proposals should provide for the use of remote procedures in taking a majority of initial claims. The Department plans to reevaluate its criteria with regard to future telephone implementation grants.

Relationship between Remote Initial Claimstaking and One-Stop Career Centers: The UI program is a significant part of the State's new workforce development system. Therefore, its role in the State's One-Stop Career Center operations is considered significant whether it is an in-person physical presence or through the use of remote access. As a part of the national initiative of building a high-priority integrated Workforce Development System, ETA is initiating a national dialogue regrading the development of a vision for the UI program within the Workforce Development (or One-Stop Career Center) System. It is expected that a Training and Employment Information Notice will be issued in the immediate future to engage SESAs and other stakeholders in that consultative process.

Action Required: SESA Administrators should inform appropriate staff of the Department's position as set forth in this program letter.

What does federal law require today?

This guidance has been withdrawn. Ezel checks current federal labor law as it stands now and answers your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace