Back to Federal guidance
FY 2006 state unemployment insurance funding opportunities
Summary ETA announced fiscal 2006 supplemental unemployment insurance funds for priority initiatives, including new-hire directory access, data validation and interstate benefit systems, plus optional state projects. It described request criteria and included state-size and initiative-status attachments. ETA now lists the letter as Canceled.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA)
Document number
UIPL No. 28-06
Date issued
August 8, 2006
Status
Withdrawn
ETA lists this letter Canceled as of 2026-10-24; its PDF prints an expiration date of August 8, 2007.
Status last verified October 24, 2026
Is this still the rule?
This document has been withdrawn. Ezel checks what federal law requires today, under current federal labor law, and answers your situation with citations.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
Accessible letter PDF: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/UIPL/2006/UIPL28-06_508.pdf
CLASSIFICATION
Employment and Training Administration UI
Advisory System CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL
U.S. Department of Labor OWS/ DUIO
Washington, D.C. 20210 DATE
August 8, 2006
ADVISORY: UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE PROGRAM LETTER 28-06
TO: STATE WORKFORCE AGENCIES
FROM: EMILY STOVER DeROCCO /s/
Assistant Secretary
SUBJECT: Unemployment Insurance (UI) Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 Supplemental
Funding Opportunities
1. Purpose. To notify state workforce agencies (SWAs) of the availability of FY 2006
UI funds for the priority initiatives listed below and for implementation of additional
optional projects if states have already received funds for or implemented the priority
initiatives.
Priority initiatives include:
1) Access to the National Directory of New Hires (NDNH);
2) UI Data Validation;
3) Interstate Benefits (IB), Combined Wage Claim (CWC), Liable/Agent Data
Transfer (LADT) Applications and Interfaces;
4) Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) Electronic
Application; and
5) UI Required Reports (UIRR) Corrective Action.
Optional projects include:
1) Training for Adjudication Staff;
2) Improved Occupational Coding Quality;
3) Debit Cards and/or Direct Deposit for UI Benefit Payments;
4) Social Security Administration “Real Time” or Batch Data Exchange;
5) Upgraded Wage Record Databases to Record and Maintain Full Names;
6) Agent State Database for Interstate Claimants; and
7) Improved Performance.
RESCISSIONS EXPIRATION DATE
None August 8, 2007
2. References. ET Handbook No. 336, 18th Edition, State Quality Service Plans
Planning and Reporting Guidelines, and the Regional Office issuances regarding the
Unemployment Insurance FY 2005 Supplemental Funding Opportunity.
3. Background. The FY 2006 appropriation was based on economic assumptions that
anticipated higher workloads than are now projected. As a result, the Employment
and Training Administration (ETA) now estimates that a portion of the funds
appropriated for FY 2006 will not be needed to process above-base workloads, and
these excess workload funds are available to states for UI priority initiatives and other
UI purposes described below. These funds will be made available through the
supplemental budget request (SBR) process and must be obligated to states by
September 30, 2006.
4. Size-Based SBR Allowances. Each state is eligible for a maximum amount of funds
based upon the population of the state as determined by the U. S. Census Bureau.
Large states may receive a maximum of $200,000, medium size states a maximum of
$150,000 and small states a maximum of $100,000. See Attachment A for a list of
states’ sizes.
States may submit proposals in excess of the established state maximum; however,
these should be clearly marked as “extra proposals.” If funds are available to fund
extra projects they will be funded in the order that they appear on the list of optional
projects on page 1.
5. Use of Funds. These one-time funds may be used for the purposes described below.
Priority initiatives must be implemented or must be under development with a
projected completion date before a state can receive funds for the optional projects
listed below. States requesting funds for any optional project(s) must submit a
completed copy of the UI Priority Initiatives State Status Summary (Attachment B).
Each initiative is described more fully and an SBR outline for each initiative is on the
Office of Workforce Security’s web site at: www.ows.doleta.gov under “Quick
Links” 2006 SBR Projects.
Priority Projects
- Access to the NDNH: Up to $100,000 per state is available to implement the
periodic computer matching of UI claims data against data contained in the
NDNH for the purpose of identifying potential UI erroneous payments.
Additionally, funds may be used to implement or modify automated systems to
more effectively use the information obtained as a result of matching against the
NDNH, and to inform employers of the importance of reporting new hires.
Funding is available only to those states that have not already received funds for
this initiative.
- UI Data Validation (obtain an independent verification that UI data validation
extract files meet Federal requirements): Up to $100,000 per state is available to
obtain an independent verification that state extract files meet UI data validation
requirements. For states choosing to obtain an independent verification, any
remaining funds may be used to correct errors in data validation extract files, to
complete data validation implementation, training, and to correct reporting errors
discovered through data validation. Funds are available only to those states that
have not already received funds for this initiative.
- Interstate Benefits, Combined Wage Claim and Liable/Agent Data Transfer
(LADT) Applications and Interfaces: Up to $50,000 per state is available to fully
interface benefits systems with the model code or specifications for the IB, CWC
and LADT applications via the Interstate Connection (ICON) Network thus
ensuring that required data are accurate and can be transmitted electronically to
take advantage of the efficiencies these applications provide to states. One of the
lessons learned as a result of Hurricane Katrina is that these applications must be
fully implemented.
- Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) Electronic
Application: Up to $50,000 per state is available to implement the UCFE ICON
application, which provides for the electronic exchange of wage and/or separation
information from Federal agencies.
- UI Required Reports Corrective Action: Up to $25,000 per state is available to
program UI Required Reports and ensure timeliness. Regional Office staff have a
list of states that must address missing reports and all states should determine
whether they must address this project.
Optional Projects
- Training for Adjudication Staff: Up to $11,000 per state is available to
participate in Internet training developed by the National Judicial College for
adjudication staff. States may receive funding for training up to 20 adjudicators
when they agree to fund up to ten staff from other funds.
- Improve Occupational Coding Quality: Up to $100,000 per state is available to
implement AutoCoder software which was developed for the U. S. Department of
Labor (USDOL) to assist states in properly assigning occupational codes when
coding individuals’ records or job openings. AutoCoder can assist in getting UI
claimants the re-employment services they need and help them to more quickly
return to suitable employment. Funds are available only to those states that have
not already received funds for this initiative.
- Debit Cards and/or Direct Deposit for UI Benefit Payments: Up to $100,000 per
state is available to implement debit card systems for the payment of
unemployment insurance benefits.
- Social Security Administration Data Exchange: Up to $100,000 per state is
available to states to implement the Social Security Data Exchange system.
Funds are available for a real-time or batch system. A batch system is expected to
cost less than a real-time system. In addition, $51,622 is available to provide for
an independent verification of the security of the state’s ADP system as required
for the “real time” system access. This same independent validation and
verification (IV&V) may also be used for NDNH. Only those states that have not
already received the maximum allowable funds for this initiative should apply for
funding.
- Upgrade Wage Record Data Base to Record and Maintain Full Names: Up to
$100,000 per state is available to states to modify their wage records systems to
capture and retain employee full names.
- Agent State Database for Interstate Claimants: Up to $50,000 per state is
available to states to program systems to store Interstate agent claim files.
- Improve Performance: Up to $100,000 per state is available for optional projects
to implement performance improvements. FY 2005 proposed projects that were
not funded may be resubmitted for consideration.
6. Application for Supplemental Funds. The projects should be submitted in one SBR
package. To be eligible to request funds for optional initiatives, states must first
apply for funds for priority projects which they have not already implemented or
received funds to implement previously. After requesting funds for any required
initiatives in the “priority” category, states may apply the balance of their size-based
supplemental funds to initiatives they choose from the “optional” category. An
outline of the information needed for each project follows the project description.
States should use the SBR outlines for each project for which the state wishes to
apply. By applying for each project the state is agreeing to complete the project even
if no additional federal funds, in excess of this SBR, are available.
Each initiative or project proposal will be considered a section of the state’s SBR, and
each will be evaluated separately/individually. In some instances, identical
expenditures may be proposed by states for two (or more) separate projects for which
the state can only receive funding one time. When this kind of duplication occurs the
state should clearly indicate that the expenditures are duplicated in some other
sections of the SBR to ensure that the same costs are not funded twice. An SF 424A
must be submitted for each project identifying anticipated expenditures by category.
The SF 424 will not be required until the awards are decided and the states are
notified of the awards.
7. Awards and Expenditure of Supplemental Funds. Once projects have been approved,
Letters of Award will be issued to states listing all approved projects and the grant
awards for each project as well as the total funding award for the state. States will
submit one SF 424 covering all approved projects.
States must obligate the funds by December 31, 2006, and liquidate the obligations
within 90 days of that date unless they are used for automation acquisition. Funds
used for automation acquisition are available for obligation through September 30,
2008, and obligations must be expended/liquidated within 90 days of that date. Upon
written request prior to the obligation deadline, the Grant Officer may extend the
expenditure/liquidation period. In addition, while states must obligate non-
automation project funds by December 31, 2006, and automation project funds by
September 30, 2008, obligation in a contract to an outside contractor (but not to
another state agency) allows for funds to be expended/liquidated beyond the cited
dates but no later than the end of the extended period approved by the Grant Officer.
States must ensure that funded projects will be completed for the stated purpose.
8. Project Management. If during the performance period states wish to move funds
among categories within a project a new SF 424A must be submitted to the ETA
National Office for approval if the amount moved exceeds 20 percent of any category
in Section 6 of the SF 424A in the initially awarded amount for the project. The same
requirement for approval applies to movement of funds between projects if the
amount moved exceeds 20 percent of either the donating or receiving project as
initially funded.
9. Action Required. State Administrators are requested to:
(a) Provide this information to appropriate staff, review possibilities for funding, and
determine what funds may be available to the state for the initiatives or projects
listed above.
(b) Develop the SBR following the guidelines in this UIPL.
(c) Submit the SBR by close of business, August 18, 2006, via electronic submission
to the National Office at [email protected] or mail to the attention of Thomas
Stengle at the following address:
USDOL
Employment and Training Administration
Office of Workforce Security
200 Constitution Ave NW, S-4231
Washington, D.C. 20210
10. Inquiries. Inquiries should be directed to Diane Wood at (202) 693-3212, or via
email at: [email protected] or to Thomas Stengle at (202) 693-2991, or via email
at: [email protected]. Additional staff members are provided on each SBR
project descriptions to assist with questions about the specific project.
11. Attachments.
Attachment No. A, State Size Configuration Classifications for FY 2006 Funds
Attachment No. B, UI Priority Initiatives State Status Summary
Attachment: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/UIPL/2006/UIPL28-06_Att1.pdf
Attachment A
State Size Configuration Classifications Based upon State Population
for FY 2006 Funds
Alabama Medium
Alaska Small
Arizona Medium
Arkansas Medium
California Large
Colorado Medium
Connecticut Medium
Delaware Small
District of Columbia Small
Florida Large
Georgia Medium
Hawaii Medium
Idaho Medium
Illinois Large
Indiana Medium
Iowa Medium
Kansas Medium
Kentucky Medium
Louisiana Medium
Maine Medium
Maryland Medium
Massachusetts Medium
Michigan Large
Minnesota Medium
Mississippi Medium
Missouri Medium
Montana Small
Nebraska Medium
Nevada Medium
New Hampshire Medium
New Jersey Medium
New Mexico Medium
New York Large
North Carolina Medium
North Dakota Small
Ohio Large
Oklahoma Medium
Oregon Medium
Pennsylvania Large
Puerto Rico Medium
Rhode Island Small
South Carolina Medium
South Dakota Small
Tennessee Medium
Texas Large
Utah Medium
Vermont Small
Virgin Islands Small
Virginia Medium
Washington Medium
West Virginia Medium
Wisconsin Medium
Wyoming Small
Attachment: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/UIPL/2006/UIPL28-06_Att2.pdf
Attachment B
UI Priority Initiatives
State Status Summary
This form must accompany any SBR requesting funds for optional projects.
STATE: ____________________________
State Contact Name ____________________________
State Contact Phone No. ____________________________
State Contact E Mail ____________________________
Status of Priority Initiatives: States must provide the status for each of the priority
initiatives listed below if funds are being requested for any optional project. The SWA
must provide a projected completion date for any initiative(s) that are under development.
UI Required Reports means all reports that are required by the Secretary.
Please indicate the status of these priority initiatives below:
1. Access to the National Directory of New Hires (NDNH):
Implemented _________
Under Development, Projected Completion Date _________
Funds requested with this submission _________
2. UI Data Validation:
Implemented _________
Under Development, Projected Completion Date _________
Funds requested with this submission _________
3. Interstate Benefits (IB), Combined Wage Claims (CWC), and Liable/Agent Data
Transfer (LADT) Applications and Interfaces:
Implemented _________
Under Development, Projected Completion Date _________
Funds requested with this submission _________
4. Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) Program
Electronic Application:
Implemented _________
Under Development, Projected Completion Date _________
Funds requested with this submission _________
5. UI Required Reports (UIRR) Corrective Action:
Submitting all UIRRs timely _________
Under Development, Projected Completion Date _________
Funds requested with this submission _________
What does federal law require today?
This guidance has been withdrawn. Ezel checks current federal labor law as it stands now and answers your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace