Back to Federal guidance
Using EUC funds for unemployment benefits to laid-off staff
Summary ETA told state agencies that Emergency Unemployment Compensation administrative funds could pay unemployment benefits for employees who worked full time on EUC activities and were laid off directly because that program ended. For staff who also worked on other activities, the letter allows a proportional charge to EUC funds. ETA now lists the advisory as Canceled.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA)
Document number
UIPL No. 22-14
Date issued
September 11, 2014
Status
Withdrawn
ETA's advisory listing marks this letter Canceled as of 2026-10-24, although its PDF prints an expiration date of Continuing. The guidance addressed layoffs following the EUC program's January 2014 expiration.
Status last verified October 24, 2026
Is this still the rule?
This document has been withdrawn. Ezel checks what federal law requires today, under current federal labor law, and answers your situation with citations.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
CLASSIFICATION
EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UI/EUC
ADVISORY SYSTEM CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR DFAS
Washington, D.C. 20210 DATE
September 11, 2014
ADVISORY: UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE PROGRAM LETTER NO. 22-14
TO: STATE WORKFORCE AGENCIES
FROM: PORTIA WU /s/
Assistant Secretary
SUBJECT: Use of Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC) Administrative Funds
to Pay Unemployment Insurance (UI) Benefits to Staff Separated as a Result of
the EUC Program Not Being Extended
1. Purpose. To notify State Workforce Agencies of the conditions under which EUC
administrative funds may be used to pay UI benefits to staff separated as a result of the EUC
program expiring on January 1, 2014.
2. References.
• Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-252);
• American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Public Law 111-5);
• Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (Public Law 112-96); and
• American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (Public Law 112-240).
3. Background. The EUC program was first implemented on July 1, 2008, by the
Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2008, and was extended several times to provide
unemployment compensation (UC) to long-term unemployed workers unable to find
employment as a result of the Great Recession and its aftermath. The American Taxpayer
Relief Act of 2012, enacted on January 2, 2013, contained the most recent extension of EUC,
which expired on January 1, 2014. The extension of EUC contained in the Middle Class Tax
Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 contained a provision requiring certain EUC claimants
to participate in reemployment services and eligibility assessments (RES/REAs). The EUC
RES/REA requirements were in effect through January 1, 2014.
As a result of EUC not being extended, states began laying-off staff working on EUC
activities, which abruptly created a financial liability for payment of UC when these former
state agency employees filed for UC.
4. Funding UC Costs. The Department of Labor (Department) advises states that EUC
administrative funds may be used to pay UC costs for individuals who were working full-
RESCISSIONS EXPIRATION DATE
None Continuing
time on EUC activities before the termination of the program and whose layoffs are a direct
result of the expiration of the EUC program. States may also use these funds to reimburse
accounts to which such UC costs were charged. For individuals who worked on EUC
activities and non-EUC activities (e.g., worked on collection of EUC and regular UC
overpayments after the termination of EUC) and who were laid off due to the EUC program’s
expiration, UC may be paid with EUC administrative funds on a pro-rata basis according to
the activities on which they worked. Use of the EUC administrative funds for UC applies to
individuals laid-off as a result of the termination of the EUC program. It is the state’s
responsibility to ensure the pro-rata amounts are accurate and in accordance with state law
and appropriate cost allocation methods as they are subject to audit.
If sufficient EUC administrative funds are not available in the state, states may request
additional EUC administrative funds to pay the UC costs of separated staff described above
or to reimburse accounts to which those costs are being charged. To do so, states must
submit these supplemental requests on line 26 of form ETA UI-3 with costs noted in the
Comments section. In addition to UC costs, states are asked to include the number of
employees collecting such benefits by entering the number of first payments in the Comments
section. Information covering the first two calendar quarters of 2014 may be reported on the
June 2014 UI-3 report. States that have already submitted the UI-3 report for the quarter
ending June 2014 may submit a revised report, or they may submit the costs on the next UI-3
submission. If states incur additional costs in the quarter ending September 2014 and beyond,
they may continue to report such costs on future submissions of the UI-3 report.
5. Action Requested. The Department requests that state administrators provide the above
information and instructions to all appropriate staff.
6. Inquiries. Please direct inquiries to the appropriate regional office.
2
What does federal law require today?
This guidance has been withdrawn. Ezel checks current federal labor law as it stands now and answers your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace