2002 special Reed Act distribution and state reporting
Is this still the rule?
This document has been withdrawn. Ezel checks what federal law requires today, under current federal labor law, and answers your situation with citations.
U.S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
Washington, D.C. 20210
Classification: OWS
Correspondence symbol: TEUFA
Issue date: April 4, 2002
ADVISORY: UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE PROGRAM LETTER NO. 20-02
TO: ALL STATE WORKFORCE AGENCIES
FROM: GRACE A. KILBANE
Administrator
Office of Workforce Security
SUBJECT: Reed Act Distribution Under the Temporary Extended
RESCISSIONS: None
EXPIRATION DATE: April 4, 2002
Purpose. To notify states of their portion of the $8 billion Reed Act distribution and to provide the methodology used to determine the distribution.
References. Public Law (PL) 107 – 147; Title IX, Social Security Act (SSA).
Background. Section 209 of the TEUCA requires a special Reed Act distribution --- the transfer of money from the Federal Unemployment Account to each state’s account in the Unemployment Trust Fund (UTF). That section also specifies the methodology used to determine the distribution and the terms and conditions of the use of the money.
State Distribution. Each state’s portion is listed in the attachment to this advisory. State accounts were credited on March 13, 2002.
Methodology of the Distribution. The following calculations were made to determine each state’s share of the $8 billion distribution:
The amount that would have been distributed in October of 2001, had the Reed Act distribution not been capped at $100 million, was determined. This amount was about $9.34 billion. (Section 903(d)(2)(A)(i), SSA, as added by the TEUCA.)
Each state’s share of the $9.34 billion was determined based on the state’s share of FUTA taxable wages in calendar year 2000. (Section 903(d)(2)(A), SSA, as added by the TEUC, and Section 903(a)(2), SSA.)
Each state’s share of the $100 million actually distributed in October of 2001 was deducted from its share of the $9.34 billion, reducing the national total to $9.24 billion. (Section 903(d)(2)(A)(ii), SSA, as added by the TEUCA.)
The $8 billion limitation was applied. According to Section 903(d)(2)(B)(ii), SSA, as added by the TEUCA, this reduction is applied “ratably.” This means that each state’s share of the $9.24 billion was reduced proportionately to arrive at the $8 billion. If the state had an outstanding Title XII loan, the loan balance was retired before any money was transferred to the state’s account (903 (b)(2) SSA).
Action Required. States are requested to:
Compare the attached amount with the amount deposited to your state’s account in the UTF. Any discrepancies should be brought to the immediate attention of the Bureau of Public Debt, managers of the UTF, and the appropriate Regional Office.
Report these deposits on line 15 of the ETA 2112. Also report them, and all other Reed Act transactions, e.g., withdrawals, on the ETA 8403.
Follow the new instructions on drawing Reed Act money. As of March 15, 2002, 6 new lines were added in the Automated Standard Application for Payment System (ASAP). One of the lines is labeled: “Reed Act – March 13, 2002.” When drawing Reed Act funds from the March 13, 2002, distribution, this line should be used.
Inquiries. Direct questions to the appropriate Regional Office.
Attachment. State special Reed Act distributions.
Attachment: Special Reed Act distribution, March 8, 2002
Official attachment: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/UIPL/2002/UIPL20-02_Attach.pdf
| State or territory | Distribution |
|---|---|
| Alabama | $110,623,477 |
| Alaska | $14,820,932 |
| Arizona | $144,079,575 |
| Arkansas | $63,958,998 |
| California | $936,873,766 |
| Colorado | $142,666,574 |
| Connecticut | $100,418,304 |
| Delaware | $26,024,719 |
| Dist. of Col. | $25,765,401 |
| Florida | $449,667,718 |
| Georgia | $249,673,858 |
| Hawaii | $30,761,048 |
| Idaho | $32,244,586 |
| Illinois | $376,244,918 |
| Indiana | $174,573,012 |
| Iowa | $82,395,262 |
| Kansas | $78,166,750 |
| Kentucky | $103,829,381 |
| Louisiana | $105,499,296 |
| Maine | $32,486,816 |
| Maryland | $142,929,005 |
| Massachusetts | $193,639,110 |
| Michigan | $291,485,481 |
| Minnesota | $163,061,573 |
| Mississippi | $64,670,097 |
| Missouri | $161,426,814 |
| Montana | $18,551,627 |
| Nebraska | $48,380,203 |
| Nevada | $68,082,942 |
| New Hampshire | $38,475,620 |
| New Jersey | $242,816,310 |
| New Mexico | $38,599,338 |
| New York | $491,343,135¹ |
| North Carolina | $240,892,032 |
| North Dakota | $15,267,835 |
| Ohio | $343,709,635 |
| Oklahoma | $81,441,628 |
| Oregon | $98,029,105 |
| Pennsylvania | $337,595,975 |
| Puerto Rico | $48,875,605 |
| Rhode Island | $27,123,409 |
| South Carolina | $108,203,982 |
| South Dakota | $19,140,671 |
| Tennessee | $162,633,730 |
| Texas | $596,446,497 |
| Utah | $61,627,678 |
| Vermont | $16,395,967 |
| Virginia | $214,949,942 |
| Virgin Islands | $1,950,917 |
| Washington | $167,011,815 |
| West Virginia | $36,210,068 |
| Wisconsin | $166,214,419 |
| Wyoming | $12,043,444 |
| Total | $8,000,000,000 |
¹ New York’s amount was reduced by $188,812,649.04 of outstanding loan balance; net distribution = $302,530,485.96.
What does federal law require today?
This guidance has been withdrawn. Ezel checks current federal labor law as it stands now and answers your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace