District of Columbia claimant-hearing conformity decision
Apply this to your situation
This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.
+----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR | CLASSIFICATION |
| Employment and Training Administration | |
| Washington, D. C. 20213 | UI |
|
+-----------------------------------+
| | CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL |
| | |
| | TEURL |
|
+-----------------------------------+
| | ISSUE DATE |
| | |
| | March 6, 1986 |
+----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| RESCISSIONS | EXPIRATION DATE |
| | |
| None | March 31, 1987 |
+----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
+-------------------------+-------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| DIRECTIVE | : | UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE PROGRAM LETTER NO. 18-86 |
+-------------------------+-------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
|
+-------------------------+-------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| TO | : | STATE EMPLOYMENT SECURITY AGENCIES |
+-------------------------+-------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
|
+-------------------------+-------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| FROM | : | BARBARA ANN FARMER |
| | | Acting Administrator for |
| | | Regional Management |
+-------------------------+-------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
|
+-------------------------+-------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| SUBJECT | : | Secretary's Decision in the 1985 District of Columbia Conformity Proceedings |
+-------------------------+-------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
-
Purpose. To announce the Secretary's Decision in the 1985 District of Columbia (D.C.) conformity proceedings.
-
References. Sections 303(a)(1) and 303(a)(3) of the Social Security Act (SSA); 20 C.F.R. Section 601.5; Secretary's Decision in Case No. 84-CCP-2, dated October 28, 1985.
-
Background. Conformity and substantial compliance proceedings under Section 303(b)(2) of the Social Security Act and 20 C.F.R. Section 601.5 were initiated with the District of Colombia in 1984. At issue was whether certain D.C. rules pertaining to the conduct of hearings pursuant to claimant appeals conform with and comply substantially with Section 303(a)(1), the "methods of administration" requirement, and Section 303(a)(3), the "fair hearing" requirement, of the SSA. When a claimant is denied benefits because of a discharge from work for misconduct, D.C. rules absolve the claimant from presenting evidence in support of his/her claim unless the former employer appears at the hearing and presents evidence to counter the claim. In such cases where the employer fails to appear, the initial determination is automatically reversed and benefits are awarded.
A hearing on this issue before a Department of Labor administrative law judge (ALJ) was held on November 27, 1984. On February 21, 1985, the ALJ issued a recommended decision and on October 28, 1985, the Secretary issued his Decision.
-
Secretary's Decision. The Secretary determined that the challenged rules are not in conflict with Sections 303(a)(1) and 303(a)(3), SSA, and that the District of Columbia unemployment compensation law conforms with Sections 303(a)(1) and 303(a)(3) of the Social Security Act.
-
Action Required. Administrators are requested to provide the above information to appropriate staff.
-
Inquiries. Direct inquiries to the appropriate regional office.
-
Attachment. Secretary's Decision in the 1985 District of Columbia conformity proceedings.
The Secretary’s separate adjudicative decision is linked at https://oui.doleta.gov/dmstree/uipl/uipl86/uipl_1886a.htm; it is not transcribed here.
What does federal law require in your situation?
Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace