Back to Federal guidance
State UI benefit operations self-assessment review cycle
Summary ETA told state UI agencies they no longer had to review benefit operations with the State Self-Assessment Tool every year as originally described in UIPL 18-17. ETA was considering a biennial or triennial cycle and said it would seek state feedback before issuing revised instructions. The letter did not settle the new review frequency.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA)
Document number
UIPL No. 18-17, Change 1
Date issued
November 7, 2019
Status
Active
ETA’s listing marks this change Active, and its accessible PDF prints “Rescissions: None” and “Expiration Date: Continuing.” It removes the annual review requirement from UIPL 18-17 and says ETA will issue further instructions.
Status last verified October 24, 2026
Apply this to your situation
This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
CLASSIFICATION
EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UIPL
ADVISORY SYSTEM CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OUI/DUIO
Washington, D.C. 20210 DATE
November 7, 2019
ADVISORY: UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE PROGRAM LETTER NO. 18-17,
Change 1
TO: STATE WORKFORCE AGENCIES
FROM: JOHN PALLASCH /s/
Assistant Secretary
SUBJECT: Announcing Next Steps in the Implementation of the Unemployment Insurance
(UI) Benefit Operations State Self-Assessment Tool, Including Frequency of
Future Reviews
1. Purpose. To announce the next steps for state implementation of the UI Benefits Operations
State Self-Assessment Tool (State Self-Assessment Tool): The Employment and Training
Administration (ETA) intends to refine the State Self-Assessment Tool and processes based
on feedback from the states and ETA plans to move to a biennial or triennial review cycle for
future State Self-Assessment reviews.
2. Action Requested. State Administrators should provide this information to all appropriate
staff.
3. Summary and Background.
a. Summary — Upon completion of the state UI agencies’ inaugural implementation and
use of the State Self-Assessment Tool, ETA is announcing a new triennial review cycle
for future State Self-Assessment reviews and ETA’s intent to seek input from the state
UI agencies on the tool and its processes to enable ETA to make improvements.
b. Background — Beginning in 2015, ETA initiated an effort to reengineer a variety of
processes used by the federal-state UI system for UI benefit program accountability.
Additional information about the reengineering effort is provided in Training and
Employment Notice (TEN) No. 03-15 and TEN No. 08-14. An important outcome of
this reengineering effort was the development of an evaluation tool to support states in
conducting independent self-assessments of various functional and program areas of UI
benefit operations. In collaboration with state UI agencies, ETA designed and
developed the self-assessment tool to help ensure program integrity and quality
performance with a focus on state UI benefits operations to identify operational issues
that may adversely affect the proper administration of the UI program. ETA
announced the UI Benefits Operations State Self-Assessment Tool in UI Program
Letter (UIPL) No. 18-17, on July 28, 2017.
RESCISSIONS EXPIRATION DATE
None Continuing
The State Self-Assessment Tool assists states to routinely assess, monitor, and improve
its own operations and performance. It assists ETA in its oversight and monitoring of
the states’ UI benefits operations and identifies areas requiring technical assistance.
The federal-state UI partnership supports continuous program improvement and helps
to strengthen and improve the overall operational performance and quality within the
UI system.
ETA instructed state UI agencies to complete and submit their responses based on their
first reviews using the Self-Assessment Tool by April 15, 2019.
4. Improvements to the State Self-Assessment Tool and Processes. ETA intends to refine
the State Self-Assessment Tool and processes based on states’ feedback regarding its
experience in using the tool for the first time. ETA’s Regional Offices will be reaching out
to states for user feedback in the near future with the goal of identifying areas for
improvement and making the State Self-Assessment Tool more user-friendly and valuable to
the states.
5. Change to the Frequency of the State Self-Assessment Review Cycles. As provided in
UIPL No. 18-17, ETA originally expected states to conduct annual reviews using the State
Self-Assessment Tool following the first review cycle. However, during the inaugural
review cycle and through feedback gathered during the quarterly check-ins with states and
the recent feedback sessions with state UI Directors, ETA determined a different review
cycle would better suit the goals of the State Self-Assessment. Based on the feedback, ETA
intends to implement a new frequency for the review cycle. It will likely be a biennial or
triennial review cycle, depending on the changes that will be made to the tool’s structure and
content. ETA is also considering whether to spread the review process over each year of the
cycle. As a result, ETA no longer requires states to conduct the review on an annual basis as
originally set out in UIPL No. 18-17.
Upon completion of revisions to the State Self-Assessment Tool, ETA will provide states
additional guidance on the revised Tool and processes including implementation instructions
and information on the frequency of the new review cycle.
6. Inquiries. Please direct inquiries to the appropriate ETA Regional Office.
7. References.
Unemployment Insurance Program Letter No. 18-17, Unemployment Insurance Benefits
Operations Self-Assessment Tool,
(https://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/corr_doc.cfm?DOCN=9282);
UIPL No. 17-16, Reengineering Unemployment Insurance (UI) Benefits Program
Accountability Process: High Priority Designation of States with Sustained Poor
Performance, (https://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/corr_doc.cfm?docn=3910);
2
UIPL No. 17-14, Revised Employment and Training (ET) Handbook No. 336,
18thEdition: Unemployment Insurance (UI) State Quality Service Plan (SQSP) Planning
and Reporting Guidelines,
(https://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/corr_doc.cfm?DOCN=9690);
TEN No. 03-15, Reengineering Unemployment Insurance (UI) Benefits Program
Accountability Processes: Update on Implementation Progress and State Impacts
(https://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/corr_doc.cfm?DOCN=6837); and
TEN No. 08-14, Reengineering Unemployment Insurance (UI) Benefits Program
Accountability Processes, (https://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/corr_doc.cfm?DOCN=4692).
8. Attachments. Not Applicable.
3
What does federal law require in your situation?
Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace