Back to Federal guidance

Correction to quality appraisal answer on nonmonetary determination promptness

Summary ETA corrected the second answer attached to UIPL 10-93. When a potential issue is detected before the claimant certifies for the affected week, states should start the nonmonetary determination timeliness count from the week ending date of the week in which that affected week is certified. The change directed states to replace the earlier answer and give the correction to Quality Appraisal staff.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA)
Document number
UIPL No. 10-93, Change 1
Date issued
December 30, 1992
Status
Unknown
The change prints a December 31, 1993 expiration date; no current cancellation or replacement is confirmed.
Status last verified October 26, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
The change prints a December 31, 1993 expiration date; no current cancellation or replacement is confirmed. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE PROGRAM LETTER NO. 10-93, Change 1

Subject: Quality Appraisal Issues: Questions and Answers - Nonmonetary Determinations Promptness, and Emergency Unemployment Compensation
Purpose: To correct information provided in UIPL No. 10-93, dated December 2, 1992.
To: All State Employment Security Agencies
From: Barbara Ann Farmer, Administrator for Regional Management
Date: December 30, 1992
Expiration Date: December 31, 1993
Rescissions: None
Contact: Direct questions to the Regional Office.

References: ETA Handbook No. 365, Second Edition and ETA Handbook No. 361, Revised October 1, 1986.

Background: UIPL No. 10-93 provided answers to questions that had arisen at a training session held at the Latham Hotel in Georgetown in August. The information given in the second answer in the attachment to UIPL No. 10-93 was inadvertently given and is incorrect.

Correct Answer: ETA Handbook No. 365, Second Edition, Page 9, states, "If a potential issue arises and is detected prior to the claimant certifying for the week which would be affected, it is not to be considered an issue (detected) until the week is claimed." To further clarify, the start date for timeliness is the week ending date of the week in which the affected week is certified.

Action Required: Line out the second answer in the attachment to UIPL No. 10-93, write in the correct answer, and provide this change to UIPL No. 10-93 to all Quality Appraisal staff.

Attachments: None.

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace